• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Anyone got any experience with this?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Anyone got any experience with this?

    Hursh on Agriculture

    April 30, 2009
    $100 a tonne for maximum elevator tarriff
    The Canadian Wheat Board has been warning producers to exercise caution when signing malting barley contracts. Knowing the terms and conditions and understanding what you’re signing is good advice with any contract. With malting barley, it’s also a good idea to check primary elevator tariffs. The published rates are the maximum a grain company can charge for receiving, elevation and loading out. These rates are available on the Canadian Grain Commission website. When you look at the rates, one company stands out. Most companies on most grains have a maximum posted rate of somewhere between $10 and $25 a tonne. However, Canada Malting Co. Ltd. with its big malting plant in Calgary and other plants in other cities is posting a maximum handling tariff of $100 a tonne. If you go back and examine past postings, Canada Malting was at $40 a tonne early in the crop year and then it suddenly bumped rates to the ridiculous level of $100. Many producers have reported contractual problems with Canada Malting. Since the company can legally charge its maximum published tariff, there’s probably no way a producer can actually win a contract dispute. I’m Kevin Hursh.

    #2
    Hopper,

    These folks have also been the biggest supporters of the CWB 'single desk'. Does anyone actually wonder why?

    Comment


      #3
      Yeah but think about it! There is always the 5 cent/bu malt bonus, to git rich on. Do the math 100 bu/ac, nothin to sneeze at eh! Down with Canada Malt, boooooooooo!

      Comment


        #4
        the $100 max tarriff filed was done to give them the ability to take some over delivery on contracts. They are not able to over deliver on contracts as per the CWB due to the closed pool, so this is what they are taking on farmer's over delivered malt. Better than giving them feed which is the other option. I don't know all the details, but I do know that it is not being applied to contracted grain, but only to over delivered grain.

        Comment


          #5
          Sorry Broker. That doesn't cut it. Tarrif was set at $100/MT on Sept. 12, 2008. Board closed the Pool in February of 2009.

          Comment


            #6
            Well no one has ever mentioned being charged this excessive elevation. So broker why cannot they take over contract anyway is there a purpose for that? And cannot the CWB control the amount of elevation tariff? Haven't grown barley for a few years now but I think how it works for the farmer you can be under contract a little but not over. Just seems like CWB grandstanding to me.

            Comment

            • Reply to this Thread
            • Return to Topic List
            Working...