Done, Seeding now time to hit the lake.

[parsley]

"some animals had become more equal than others"


Where have you been? The Wheat Board treats farm groups according to how much they need to shut them up.

Every presentation to the Board and Standing Committees, both Senate and Parliamentary, and CWB committees, and letters and courtcases have exposed "teachers' pets" that the Board has made exceptions for:

1. Feed mills.
They lobbied.
Each year, millions of bushels of feed wheat and barley go through the Export Manufactured Feed Agreement which is a fancy Wheat Board license on fancy paper.(EMFA licensed grains bypass Board grain and Board marketing. MILLIONS of bushels! No buybacks. No Board marketing. Joe Farmer should have the same. It is a position I have always promoted.

2. Seed Growers

They lobbied years ago and bypass Board marketing/ Board poooling. Do they pay a fee? No. Buyback? No

Why the hell not? Joe Farmer does.

3. Quebec and Ontario do not do buybacks. Or pay license fees either.Why not?

4. Heritage Grains.

We grow ancient barley. I've said it a hundred times. We do not do a buyback. None, Mc. Period. We get our CWB license to export directly from the CWB , and pay no fee, and do no buyback, but all the while asking for the same for farmer Joe.I should just shut up and snooze.

5. organcis

we lobbied, not only vigorously, but with facts, and got a reduced buyback after years of paying atrocious buybacks, but we only got it because we embarrassed the Board so damn much in Parliament and in the press, and radio,, even the Liberals were asking the heat to get tuned down. So the Board lowered the buybacks.

and on and on.

Did you know that the entire area called Cryston-Wyndell was part of the Designated Area? And they got pissed off and not only did they not do a buyback as you are required to do, they lobbied, but finally Ralph Goodale removed the entire area from the Designated Area?

Did you also know that a man by the name of Mr. Sommerville trucked his wheat across the border from Saskatchewan into an Alberta feedlot to feed his cows, and the Wheat Board had the RCMP come to his farm, arrest him, put him in jail?

Those were the days when the Wheat Board took it upon themselves to arrest any farmer moving FEED GRAIN, yes feed wheat and barley, from one province to another.
He wfought his way to the Supreme Court of Canada and won his case against the bloody Wheat board, and after he did, the Wheat Board had to allow interprovincial trucking and selling and feeding of feed wheat nd barley the farmer owned.

That, Mc, is why Saskatchewan farmers today, or Manitoba farmers today, can sell feed grain to a feedlot in Alberta, from Saskatchewan

I drove out and intervied Mr. Sommerville a few years ago. He gave me all his documents to do my research with.

He is a hero. And he did what he did for guys like you.

The Wheat board will tell you anything to try and prevent you from getting a license. If you roll over, they win.Most farmers argue a bit and then snooze.

Organics fought long and hard to get a license without doing any buyback at all, just like Ontario gets.

All organics ended up with was a lower priced buyback. Lower than you pay, though. A consolation prize to shut us up.

A no buyback license and a buybacked license are two completely different things.

That being said, for years, organics sold grain and paid a terrible buyback that was so high it often stopped sales.

When it did go through, the buyback money all went into conventional pooling accounts, which you and conventional farmers got to divy up.

Organcis got sweet nothing for a 3 dollar buyback. Or a five dollar buyback. No marketing. Not transportation. No final payment.

And I have been very very clear, that buybacks should be disposed of. Not made lower or higher. Disposed of.

All designated area farmers should be able to apply for a license, just as Ontario and Quebec gets, without doing the buyback.

And Mc, all of the licensing right across Canada is paid for by Prairie farmers only.

The Ontario Wheat Board has to get CWB licenses but only Westerners pay the bill.

It's time you looked at the big picture. Know what the hell your business is about.

And learn about the Act that makes your life a payee.

Quit worrying about whether Joe or Mark or Mary pay a few cents more or less. Demand that you shouldn't have to pay a bloody thing,. Ontario sure doesn't. How can we be so stupid?

PS

Is this what you'd call a rant? LOL Pars

So what did organics end up with?

From where I sit, and in my opinion, organcis deals with a slimy rotten Wheat Board that tabulated and contacted the name of our buyers on every bloody buyback we did, and then proceeded to undersell us, using your conventional money, "Hey Joe, have I got a deal for you." Now, they market organics.

Scum.

No, pond scum.

[parsley]

<p></p>
<p class="EC_style8ptBK"><strong>[URL="http://parsleysnotebook.blogspot.com/2009/06/has-any-farmer-seen-belated-cwb.html"](Worry about the sweaty lip, not your money, right?)[/URL]</strong></p>

[mcfarms]

The point is I am part of a group that does just as much if not more as organics to verify the quality of their grain, who developed in conjunction with the end user a world recognized national export award winning program and which is fully closed loop and yet our grain has no oppurtunity for the same 3 dollar bybacks why? I agree it stinks and the board needs to be gone because of things exactly as you described picking and choosing winners and losers fly's completely in the face of the wheat boards mandate. Trust me years ago I believed in working to make the system better for all and did work a little with the fbr in our area to try and nudge changes from within. thats what I thought would be the best way, but what I found was a system that by trying to be all things to all people was failing everyone and continue too to this day despite the assurances to the contrary. But my point here is I'm sorry but as long as MOST of us are stuck in this system. SOME of the producers who basically aren't have no standing in my eyes. SO you never answered my question WHO's the boards pal parsely me or you????? We both know and now everyone else that reads this thread does too, I'd be changing my handle to piggly as your nose is way deeper obviously in the trough than mine ever was....oink oink

[per]

I have no idea how that post got in this thread. It didn't fit too well as it was an answer to a question on a thread in beef. It is there too! Mc, I don't mind a little casual conversation in the Marketing section. Ever sat at a Board table and not had some casual conversation? Can't be business all day long. Must make time to figure out how to make and consume corn malt. Note to self.

[parsley]

I was surprised when Mcfarms called me this afternoon, and what a delight that a brave young farmer would take over an hour on the phone to take on a feisty Agriviller. lol

As it turns out, we're pretty much on the same page. He's reasoned and respectful, and has a sense of humor, and is a smart farmer.

And I admire the initiative and diplomacy on his part to end a pissing match between two people on the same side. My loss. I was rather enjoying it. lol

I agree with Mcfarms that it is wrong that organics or anyone for that matter, gets preferential CWB treatment. But I will say that organics had the best of intentions. Organics' buybacks originally, were way higher than conventional grain, (did anyone go to bat for us? Nope) and so we asked for relief by requesting no-buyback licenses from the CWB for all Western farmers just as Ontario enjoys. Dumb turkeys at the Board refused.

Instead, the Board issued lower-costing buybacks to only organics. Low cost licenses are very different from no buyback licenses.(Organics' low coat licenses have already been "upped", did you know?) The CWB passed this policy to lower the decibel of squawk from organics; but it also ended up pitting conventional farmers against organic farmers.

So, I agree that in some ways I am the pot calling the kettle black. Conventional farmer Mc doesn't get a lower buyback. Organic Parsley can get favored buybacks.

But other farmers also have access to closed system deals I've never even heard of, that are set right into the monopoly, ones that I cannot access, (Warburtons in Manitoba ie), andprobably Mc might even have heard of some of them.

Mc reminded me, nicely I must say, that I am stubborn and won't let go, and that I do like to get the last Wheat Board word. And I have to admit this is so, but my defence is that I'm me.

On a personal level: This farm sells ancient barley and einchorn and bypasses the buyback altogether, because John negotiated with the Board, amicably on both sides, for those grains to be able to bypass Board marketing entirely, and Board pooling entirely, and Board buybacks entirely; the same as Ontario.

It wasn't long after his negotiating,that policy changed and both conventional farmers as well as organic farmers, who grow spelt, einchorn etc., have identical opportunity...and both have no buybacks. That's good for both that was never there before.

In answer to your question Mc, we rarely do buybacks because we rarely grow Board grain varieties for export that demands buybacks. Overall, we have never done well on the few buybacks we've done, although I know folks who've made money on them.

Mc, as it turns out neither one of us is the Wheat board's pal, as it turns out Conventionals and Organics can work together to bring change that is good for both.

And as it turns out, Mc made his mamma proud. Pars