Back to the "ethics" question.
Parsley bristles at the thought of being part of a global science experiment. Well they are going on all the time and often we don't even notice. Why? Because there are few problems and almost always the positives outweigh the negatives.
Let me give one example <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccine">vaccines. </a> And let me get even more specific, this year the most well known global experiment will be the <a href="http://www.calgaryherald.com/story_print.html?id=1905048&sponsor=">H1N1 flu vaccine.</a>
Developed by profit motivated multi-nationals over a very short period of time , tested for only a short period of time and multiplied in chicken eggs. Some of the most vulnerable people in society will be injected with it first, pregnant women, health-care workers, children and people with chronic conditions such as diabetes or asthma.
Now it seems to me Parsley that you would be opposed to this on a number of fronts. We just don't know what the long term consequences of this vaccine are going to be, furthermore your organic chicken eggs are now at a theoretical risk of being contaminated with genetic material you don't want in them. Is this not a bigger deal than the detection of .05% of GM DNA in a muffin?
Are you opposed to this new vaccine because it gives you the heebie geebees?
I myself am quite comfortable with this "global experiment". I'd much rather have the vaccine around than not. And believe that it would be unethical to deny people this treatment based on what we don't know.
Parsley bristles at the thought of being part of a global science experiment. Well they are going on all the time and often we don't even notice. Why? Because there are few problems and almost always the positives outweigh the negatives.
Let me give one example <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccine">vaccines. </a> And let me get even more specific, this year the most well known global experiment will be the <a href="http://www.calgaryherald.com/story_print.html?id=1905048&sponsor=">H1N1 flu vaccine.</a>
Developed by profit motivated multi-nationals over a very short period of time , tested for only a short period of time and multiplied in chicken eggs. Some of the most vulnerable people in society will be injected with it first, pregnant women, health-care workers, children and people with chronic conditions such as diabetes or asthma.
Now it seems to me Parsley that you would be opposed to this on a number of fronts. We just don't know what the long term consequences of this vaccine are going to be, furthermore your organic chicken eggs are now at a theoretical risk of being contaminated with genetic material you don't want in them. Is this not a bigger deal than the detection of .05% of GM DNA in a muffin?
Are you opposed to this new vaccine because it gives you the heebie geebees?
I myself am quite comfortable with this "global experiment". I'd much rather have the vaccine around than not. And believe that it would be unethical to deny people this treatment based on what we don't know.
Comment