So few people can see further than their own personal situation.
I have concluded that CWB supporters are in one of two camps. The first group sees the CWB as an equallizer for the majority of their neighbors; but they themselves market their grains outside the CWB as organic or through "registered" seed businesses. Make no mistake; those producers support the CWB largely to protect their personal special status that the majority do not enjoy.
The second CWB supporter camp are satisfied to see that no one can do any better than they themselves. These are the producers who say they can't afford to store grain, build bins and make tough decisions to just not participate in markets that don't return their costs of production. In the past these (usually) strong free enterprizers have frequently held their hands out for subsidies; insurance proceeds etc. to make up for as much of the shortfall as possible.
If you want to make a statement; cutting back to 1/3 isn't enough. If the CWB had nothing to market (for even a short period); then you've made a forceful statement. The many farmers who would undermine that goal; will continue to be responsible for their actions. I doubt they will ever see the damage they do to everyone including themselves. All we will hear is the whining.
I have concluded that CWB supporters are in one of two camps. The first group sees the CWB as an equallizer for the majority of their neighbors; but they themselves market their grains outside the CWB as organic or through "registered" seed businesses. Make no mistake; those producers support the CWB largely to protect their personal special status that the majority do not enjoy.
The second CWB supporter camp are satisfied to see that no one can do any better than they themselves. These are the producers who say they can't afford to store grain, build bins and make tough decisions to just not participate in markets that don't return their costs of production. In the past these (usually) strong free enterprizers have frequently held their hands out for subsidies; insurance proceeds etc. to make up for as much of the shortfall as possible.
If you want to make a statement; cutting back to 1/3 isn't enough. If the CWB had nothing to market (for even a short period); then you've made a forceful statement. The many farmers who would undermine that goal; will continue to be responsible for their actions. I doubt they will ever see the damage they do to everyone including themselves. All we will hear is the whining.
Comment