I have been direct seeding for 3-5 years on various fields. Last year it was crazy wet here and I couldnt seed 500 acres, the land I did seed was crazy with ruts and stuckholes so I disced a lot of it last fall.
My yields on tilled fields are way higher than into stubble.
Same fertilizer rates, good emergence both sites, 10 bu/ac difference on canola and 15 bu/ac difference on wheat.
My direct seeded yields were good (50 bu canola, 75 bu CPS) but the tilled fields were way better. These werent all different fields, some were split (tilled half, harrowed and seeded the other half).
I have to do some math regarding diesel cost for tillage vs glyphosate/custom application cost for burnoff.
I am north of Red Deer and moisture conservation wasnt the reason for direct seeding, reduced weed germination and time savings from one pass seeding were the biggest factors but if I am losing %20 on yield I can spend some time in the tractor again.
Anybody else see this?
My yields on tilled fields are way higher than into stubble.
Same fertilizer rates, good emergence both sites, 10 bu/ac difference on canola and 15 bu/ac difference on wheat.
My direct seeded yields were good (50 bu canola, 75 bu CPS) but the tilled fields were way better. These werent all different fields, some were split (tilled half, harrowed and seeded the other half).
I have to do some math regarding diesel cost for tillage vs glyphosate/custom application cost for burnoff.
I am north of Red Deer and moisture conservation wasnt the reason for direct seeding, reduced weed germination and time savings from one pass seeding were the biggest factors but if I am losing %20 on yield I can spend some time in the tractor again.
Anybody else see this?
Comment