Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Marketing Challenges with Western Canada's Low Protein Soybeans.
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
-
The speaker said, "it's an implied discount, but it's real". What the hell does that mean?
It's actually not protein per se that animal feeders need from soy meal, it's the amino acids that make up the protein, primarily lysine. How does lysine content in MB soybeans compare to beans from eastern CA or the US Midwest? Does Canada's soy promotors have that data? Are they doing research in that area? Should premiums or discounts be offered on lysine content?
Comment
-
I loathe the theft and disrespect. Grading is a ****ing joke with almost unattainanble specs at times. Maybe it's time for the endusers to adjust their expectations. But why should they if they can get a cheaper raw product by having unrealistic specs. Farmer advocacy.....who is defending our interests. Can you imagine how much value is being stolen from Producers under some of the current situations.
Didn't mildew and ergot specs change? Then don't say they can't for fusarium and vomitoxin. But in the meantime......Last edited by farmaholic; Feb 15, 2017, 18:55.
Comment
-
-
So under those circustances if you had grain ranging from 13 to 15.5 px you would definitely be better off having a weighted average than selling each load on it's own protien reading. I sold wheat with discounts for px under a certain point and NO PREMIUM above another point. Nice!
Comment
-
Who does defend farmers interests? I used to have connections with the Alberta Barley Commission. Listening to how they (Commission) was lobbying hard to have foreign material specs tightened down. I used to wonder who these guys were working for? Exporters? End users? Not farmers for sure.
Same with KAP. KAP looks at the political landscape and wonders how to please gov't by handing over farmers to adapt to new, expensive, unrealistic policies like carbon taxes. With KAP it's more like, elect a President, kiss govt ass, springboard president into cushy govt job, a la Earl Geddes, Doug Chorney, etc.
Comment
-
Originally posted by farmaholic View PostSo under those circustances if you had grain ranging from 13 to 15.5 px you would definitely be better off having a weighted average than selling each load on it's own protien reading. I sold wheat with discounts for px under a certain point and NO PREMIUM above another point. Nice!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Braveheart View PostWho does defend farmers interests? I used to have connections with the Alberta Barley Commission. Listening to how they (Commission) was lobbying hard to have foreign material specs tightened down. I used to wonder who these guys were working for? Exporters? End users? Not farmers for sure.
Same with KAP. KAP looks at the political landscape and wonders how to please gov't by handing over farmers to adapt to new, expensive, unrealistic policies like carbon taxes. With KAP it's more like, elect a President, kiss govt ass, springboard president into cushy govt job, a la Earl Geddes, Doug Chorney, etc.
I personally think we need to forget commodity groups. There are two things I would like to see checkoff spent on #1 is unbiased 3rd party research #2 is lobbying government. So lets forget recipes, promoting canola oil, travelling to mexico and just hire some lobbyists and professional research nerds.
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment