• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Impressive harvest action video - Monette Farms by EpicJib Aerial Media

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by danny W1M View Post
    Thought they were doing soybeans? Maybe not as I see there outta Swift.

    Here's their website, [URL="http://www.monettefarms.ca/"]http://www.monettefarms.ca/[/URL]

    What's bigger than a BTO? Need a new acronym.
    looks like soybeans to me. maybe 30 bpa?

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by grassfarmer View Post
      Jealous of what vvalk? Having no vegetation growing outside a 90 day window, no birds, no trees and no diversity? I get more pleasure bringing an acre of my own land back to a healthy productive state through regenerative agriculture than owning thousands of the kind depicted here. When are farmers going to smarten up and realise that big doesn't equal success? Needing to farm more land each year or each generation to sustain the family is a sign on failure not success. What excites me is the growing number of new entrants proving that it's possible to make a decent living off a quarter section - that's the future and would regenerate rural communities that bucket commented on.

      The type of fossil fuel farming depicted here doesn't impress me - it's just moving other people's money around versus creating wealth from the land by pure solar conversion. An example of how far removed from reality this is getting is the 2 page spread in Agdealer today from a JD dealer offering "combine wash packages" at $799. So you get done combining, send the combines away to be washed and jet off to Hawaii for the winter all the while bemoaning how you can't make a living with current prices and there is no hope for the next generation to take over the farm.
      So it's not for you. So be it. Just say that But your comments were negative and petty. "Fossil fuel" farming?!!! Really? Making a living off a 1/4 section? What if you kids want to farm? For sure need income over 3 generations minimum so now it's 50 acres. Now you have to expand right?

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by vvalk View Post
        So it's not for you. So be it. Just say that But your comments were negative and petty. "Fossil fuel" farming?!!! Really? Making a living off a 1/4 section? What if you kids want to farm? For sure need income over 3 generations minimum so now it's 50 acres. Now you have to expand right?
        And you think they use more fossil fuel per acre then you do? What's the footprint of 160 acre individual farms.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by vvalk View Post
          So it's not for you. So be it. Just say that But your comments were negative and petty. "Fossil fuel" farming?!!! Really? Making a living off a 1/4 section? What if you kids want to farm? For sure need income over 3 generations minimum so now it's 50 acres. Now you have to expand right?
          Go back and read my first two sentences in my original post and you'll see it was your interpretation that was off not my comments. You were the one springing the jealousy accusation which was negative and petty. Fossil fuel costs on the quarter section places? running a quad and putting a couple hundred hours annually on a $9000 tractor. Grossing north of a quarter million dollars a year. Sure these guys might expand but they can afford to buy the land with the money they are making - they might get another quarter or two in time but they'll never need 20 or 100 quarters because they are playing a smarter game.

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by grassfarmer View Post
            Go back and read my first two sentences in my original post and you'll see it was your interpretation that was off not my comments. You were the one springing the jealousy accusation which was negative and petty. Fossil fuel costs on the quarter section places? running a quad and putting a couple hundred hours annually on a $9000 tractor. Grossing north of a quarter million dollars a year. Sure these guys might expand but they can afford to buy the land with the money they are making - they might get another quarter or two in time but they'll never need 20 or 100 quarters because they are playing a smarter game.
            Have any examples of that type of farm that you could point out? Genuinely curious, not arguing.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by Mjolnir View Post
              Have any examples of that type of farm that you could point out? Genuinely curious, not arguing.
              There are lots of examples - mostly new entrants to agriculture, direct marketing, livestock based, stacking enterprises. Usually based on the Joel Salatin model below.

              [URL="http://vimeo.com/81468461"]http://https://vimeo.com/81468461[/URL]

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by grassfarmer View Post
                Beauty is in the eye of the beholder I guess. I just see a bland, sterile, lifeless, chemical, industrial and mechanical scene.
                What klause was talking about in another thread leads me to this image of a healthy, sustainable landscape in which we produce our food. You'll maybe have to google it to expand and read the detail.
                [ATTACH]2124[/ATTACH]
                Thst doesnt impress local landlords. $124.00/acre cash rent and harvest my entire farm in 14 hours is the only way to go.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by grassfarmer View Post
                  Jealous of what vvalk? Having no vegetation growing outside a 90 day window, no birds, no trees and no diversity? I get more pleasure bringing an acre of my own land back to a healthy productive state through regenerative agriculture than owning thousands of the kind depicted here. When are farmers going to smarten up and realise that big doesn't equal success? Needing to farm more land each year or each generation to sustain the family is a sign on failure not success. What excites me is the growing number of new entrants proving that it's possible to make a decent living off a quarter section - that's the future and would regenerate rural communities that bucket commented on.

                  The type of fossil fuel farming depicted here doesn't impress me - it's just moving other people's money around versus creating wealth from the land by pure solar conversion. An example of how far removed from reality this is getting is the 2 page spread in Agdealer today from a JD dealer offering "combine wash packages" at $799. So you get done combining, send the combines away to be washed and jet off to Hawaii for the winter all the while bemoaning how you can't make a living with current prices and there is no hope for the next generation to take over the farm.
                  There are other methods to make a living on rural properties but they require a lot of planning and effort and marketing. Nobody is going to make a drone video of that boring stuff.
                  It takes more than observation and philosophy to succeed alternatively and a strong character to stay with it. My helper is of the new generation and never farmed. He notes grain spills from swing auger, tipped over sample pails, old samples, leaky bin doors etc etc. He says he could make a living on spilled grain. I say, ok, start collecting the spills and show me.
                  He needs a "kicker" elevator office cleaner if anyone knows where to buy and a price.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by biglentil View Post
                    Yep 70000 or is it 90000acres now X $100/acre loss. -$9million
                    This can go the other way, a gain of $9 million.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Mom and Pop

                      Those little store owners in room 101 now. If the 800 acre farms were still here, so would the store/restraints.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...