Originally posted by sumdumguy
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Land rent
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
Bgmb
Its actually more or less the same tax at the end of the day. With corporate land you would have take enough dividends so that if flows through to the shareholders.
leaving it in the company would cause high rate tax (46.6%) initially until someday when you pay dividends out.
In my opinion, if they want to remain a farmer keep farming. I would never entertain an arrangement unless the retired farmer was maybe going to work my operation for a T4's wage. That way he would see the costs and maybe put effort in the working for me.
My two cents are as follows:
In one post, the $120,000 and $60,000 would not qualify as an eligible farmer as the crop produced doesn't vary or show risk. Just because someone is doing doesn't make it right.
If a farmer wishes to go here then all of the production off the land would need to be reported on the landowners name. He then in turn has the be invoiced the applicable direct costs plus the custom rates for the service.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Richard5 View PostBgmb
Its actually more or less the same tax at the end of the day. With corporate land you would have take enough dividends so that if flows through to the shareholders.
leaving it in the company would cause high rate tax (46.6%) initially until someday when you pay dividends out.
In my opinion, if they want to remain a farmer keep farming. I would never entertain an arrangement unless the retired farmer was maybe going to work my operation for a T4's wage. That way he would see the costs and maybe put effort in the working for me.
My two cents are as follows:
In one post, the $120,000 and $60,000 would not qualify as an eligible farmer as the crop produced doesn't vary or show risk. Just because someone is doing doesn't make it right.
If a farmer wishes to go here then all of the production off the land would need to be reported on the landowners name. He then in turn has the be invoiced the applicable direct costs plus the custom rates for the service.
Comment
-
-
$4500/ac? $720,000/quarter? 3% is $135/ac. If you wanted to buy some, what could you possibly grow to make payments on that. And I thought things were stupid here! WTF...is it in the golden horseshoe of Alberta? Long past agricultural value. I guess everything is relative....and that's relatively crazy!
...farming little league here in the slum of the Ghetto, and only growing sour g****s! For my bitter whine.
Comment
-
% of land value is shit. It has to be % of crop potential. Land here (Lacombe, Blackfalds) is/has traded in the 6500-8000/ac range. 1/2 section a mile west with no residence and old 40 year old wooden bins and an aircraft hanger (older) and runway went for 1.2 million, each quarter.
These numbers are based on needing land for manure spreading, or development potential not farming income.
% doesn't work.
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment