I have been following your GMO discussion with tremendous interest, and just have to put in my two cents worth. (I hope I don't end up with organic fertilizer inside my boots!)
We have grown GMO canola for the past 3 years, and plan to again this year. It is true it is a decission based in part on costs and profitability. However, from another point of view, I would not consider producing anything, that I felt would be unsafe or detremental for my family to consume.
A conventional field of canola, which has to be sprayed for quackgrass, broadleaf weads, and wild oats would see at least 3 different types of herbicide applied at full rate.
A roundup tolerant canola field would see one type of herbicide, and only at half rate!
From a consumers point of view, or even anyone moving toward organic farming, which one would you choose to eat?
I believe that the public and many of us farmers, lack a basic understanding as previously stated. As a society, it is difficult to determine where to draw the line with technology.
Eg: A tomatoe grown on a plant, which is genetically modified with a gene from a fish,(in order to produce a cold tolerant plant), could inconceivably become a health hazard for someone allergic to fish.
Your GMO potato, I have not problem consuming either. We had a run of Colorado Potatoe beetles almost 10 years ago. The only thing we could do was hand pick them or go to really bad insecticides. Genetically modified potatoes, contain a gene which makes the leaves taste bad to the insect.
Thereby ellimimating the problem without harmful chemicals. It is not my understanding that actual insecticides are present in GMO potatoes. Maybe someone more knowledgable could correct me.
We have grown GMO canola for the past 3 years, and plan to again this year. It is true it is a decission based in part on costs and profitability. However, from another point of view, I would not consider producing anything, that I felt would be unsafe or detremental for my family to consume.
A conventional field of canola, which has to be sprayed for quackgrass, broadleaf weads, and wild oats would see at least 3 different types of herbicide applied at full rate.
A roundup tolerant canola field would see one type of herbicide, and only at half rate!
From a consumers point of view, or even anyone moving toward organic farming, which one would you choose to eat?
I believe that the public and many of us farmers, lack a basic understanding as previously stated. As a society, it is difficult to determine where to draw the line with technology.
Eg: A tomatoe grown on a plant, which is genetically modified with a gene from a fish,(in order to produce a cold tolerant plant), could inconceivably become a health hazard for someone allergic to fish.
Your GMO potato, I have not problem consuming either. We had a run of Colorado Potatoe beetles almost 10 years ago. The only thing we could do was hand pick them or go to really bad insecticides. Genetically modified potatoes, contain a gene which makes the leaves taste bad to the insect.
Thereby ellimimating the problem without harmful chemicals. It is not my understanding that actual insecticides are present in GMO potatoes. Maybe someone more knowledgable could correct me.
Comment