Who speaks for Sask. pulse growers

[grower99]

The article is maybe somewhat misleading
then.If the presentation was from a CSCA
perspective and with the CSCA board
approval fine. However,I suspect the
Pulse Canada board and its large grower
group of directors would have probably
liked to aide in the development of a
position paper on these monumental
changes if they were asked.I am somewhat
reassured that Pulse Canada's position
on important ag issues is being
discussed at its board table and a
position established. Isn't it best to
involve the PC stakeholders on policy
issues? We know that operating from a
united board gives the stand on a
particular issue more credibility.
Thanks for clarifying PC's role.

[sumdumguy]

Rareearth, I could not agree more. There needs
to be new blood alright!

[gustgd]

Let's talk Saskatchewan with Niel Billanger
600CJWW

http://www.saskpulse.com/
2 sixty second clips

[haveapulse]

The statement the pen is mightier than the sword remains a truth.

New or old blood, directors on boards should be independent, and not be organized as a party or a camp.

[sumdumguy]

Haveapulse, you mean organized as a gang?

I have been thinking about the ad campaign and
paraprasing it with friends. This display is likely
just a small part of what goes on behind closed
doors. Must be soooo much fun.

Producers pay huge levies and marketers collect
those levies free of charge for the association.
This association should answer to the
stakeholders and conduct itself in an ethical,
transparent and respectable fashion. Maybe it
has gone too far away from producer
representation.