Just yesterday it was in the news that the Alberta government is sending the message that they want pork production to double to 12 million units. What I didn't catch in the report is what the purpose of expansion in these numbers would be for. I seem to recall a big push for pork production not too many years back and prices in the toilet because of over supply.
I am going to go out on a limb here and ask if the government should be doing this type of promotion? What happens if things don't work out the way they feel it should? Do they then have a moral obligation of some sort to help when things don't go as planned, or are producers going to be left on their own to struggle? Is this sort of announcement meant as a message of hope for struggling grain producers?
Where are all these piggeries going to go? Given that come January 1, 2002 there will be new rules governing intenstive livestock operations how is this going to affect quality of life in various areas? Taiwan Sugar is till trying to get it's huge barns in here and the resulting increase in employment is about 50 people. Is that enough to warrant having these mega barns go up everywhere?
What happens to our quality of life if we have a huge increase in the number of ILO's granted by people who will not even be living near them? Do we want someone living in Edmonton making decisions for us that will have absolutely no impact on the decision maker? What about taking lessons from places like North Carolina that have absolutely polluted their lands?
My concern is that this is all coming down to economics and the environmental, social and quality of life issues are going to be pushed to the side. Is it just me or is it ironic that we are hearing these types of announcements on the eve of the new legislation coming in?
I am going to go out on a limb here and ask if the government should be doing this type of promotion? What happens if things don't work out the way they feel it should? Do they then have a moral obligation of some sort to help when things don't go as planned, or are producers going to be left on their own to struggle? Is this sort of announcement meant as a message of hope for struggling grain producers?
Where are all these piggeries going to go? Given that come January 1, 2002 there will be new rules governing intenstive livestock operations how is this going to affect quality of life in various areas? Taiwan Sugar is till trying to get it's huge barns in here and the resulting increase in employment is about 50 people. Is that enough to warrant having these mega barns go up everywhere?
What happens to our quality of life if we have a huge increase in the number of ILO's granted by people who will not even be living near them? Do we want someone living in Edmonton making decisions for us that will have absolutely no impact on the decision maker? What about taking lessons from places like North Carolina that have absolutely polluted their lands?
My concern is that this is all coming down to economics and the environmental, social and quality of life issues are going to be pushed to the side. Is it just me or is it ironic that we are hearing these types of announcements on the eve of the new legislation coming in?
Comment