• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Alta Election

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    grassfarmer, while you may not agree with the outcome, the democratic process prevailed in Alberta. Obviously the opposition parties didn't provide alternatives that Albertans were interested in. While some Green Party candidates did have a good showing, the party overall still does not have standing in the Legislature.
    When I first became involved in Ed Stelmach's leadership campaign I was ridiculed by a lot of people who thought he was just a hick farmer from Andrew. The more he has been able to meet Albertans, the more they have seen that he is really a man of integrity, one who cares for this province, and it's people.

    He has never taken for granted his right to govern, he knew he needed a mandate from Albertans, and he got a resounding one today.

    Comment


      #12
      My quarrel is not so much with Stelmach as with the old party establishment and its smugness. Big business runs this province through its continued influence over the party apparatus.
      -
      We needed a change, and we didn't get it...very sad situation.
      -

      Comment


        #13
        I have always felt the way to effect change within government is to work with the party in power. Of course business has an important voice in Alberta, business is what drives the economy of the province. Municipalities have the opportunity for a strong voice, but it is only as strong as the municipal representatives elected by the public.


        I am sure the Premier heard many concerns during this election campaign, hopefully he and his caucus will to what is necessary to address some of the issues facing Albertans.

        Comment


          #14
          There are two ways to affect change. Boot the old or work from within. I guess we will have to do the latter. A shame that Anglin never won his seat. He would have been an asset to the Legislature.

          Comment


            #15
            wow...liked to have seen the wildrose alliance fare better...quite surprized with the urban vote...this was a great opportunity for opposition parties but you wonder how could they really out spend down the middle pc already without big deficits...i know many do not like big business but personally i dislike more bureaucrats and red tape more...

            Comment


              #16
              I don't think it was a case of over spending the opposition, it was the fact that Ed and crew ran on positive change, accomplishments over the past 14 months etc., where the opposition ran on negative ads. The Wildrose/Alliance didn't have time to mount an effective campaign, and now they have no standing due to their leader losing his seat, although that will be a definite recount.

              I think Albertans liked what they saw in Ed, he isn't a loose cannon like Ralph, and he doesn't have the fatal flaws Ralph did. You will never see Eddie drunk at a homeless shelter !!!
              He will have the biggest challenge of all trying to pick his cabinet. I hope we see a cabinet minister from this part of the province, McQueen in Drayton Valley/Calmar has a good shot at cabinet, much more likely than the new fellow in Yellowhead or Vanderburg in Whitecourt/Lac Ste Anne. Ty won't have a chance at cabinet but he is a good MLA, sure represents his constituents well.

              Comment


                #17
                As a constituent of Ty Lund I would beg to differ. He has maintained the party line of supporting the exploitation of our beef industry by foreign corporations. When asked to intervene in the local fresh water oil flood project in my area he has indicated support of the landowners position to us but does nothing about it. Not a peep does he make in the legislature. Talking out both sides of his mouth just like Ray Prins proud supporter of Government spying, Bill 46 and the packer monopoly.
                What a joke calling these puppets representatives of the people.

                Comment


                  #18
                  hmm, this is obvious that Albertan who vote PC has systemic problem and they are actual true brainwash by enemies of Eastern Canada and the National Enegry Program who stole Alta $30 billion ego macho. Well all I can say to Quebec may go ahead to separate in Canada that I am against it but now I am seeing it and we are enemies within anyway. We don't want that, need to soften that but these vote can tell that, meaning we are in history. There is chance water selling down to USA with Bill 46 that weaken us. More Power Tranmission getting down to States with ease. And agree grassfarmer more packer increase control and thanks to Bill 46 and PC gotta love that.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    grassfarmer, MLA's are elected in democratic process, so obviously the majority of the electorate in Ty's constituency felt he was the man for the job. Single issues that face those of us in rural areas, don't matter a damn to most urban folks......that is why someone like Anglin didn't have a chance. Altough many rural folks felt he had represented their concerns and basically exposed the EUB skullduggery....the majority of the voters preferred Prins.

                    This is why it is crucial that rural Alberta have their fair share of cabinet ministers.....ones that realize rural issues vs urban folks that don't understand.

                    I have heard from folks in my area that opposed the AltaLink line that Ty was a good ally, and was willing to take concerns forward in the legislature, but perhaps the individual that advised me didn't know what he was talking about. He seemed to feel that Ty was one of the very few MLA's that showed interest in listening to concerns .

                    At any rate that process has to happen all over again...

                    The new Land Use Framework may show clearly where power and pipeline corridors are to be placed....hope we get another look at it shortly.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      "Single issues that face those of us in rural areas, don't matter a damn to most urban folks......that is why someone like Anglin didn't have a chance."
                      But Ponoka Lacombe is a rural seat and Joe was much more than a one issue candidate.
                      I note you state that he exposed the "EUB skullduggery" when it was in fact PC Government skullduggery - and this has been proven. A successful lie machine certainly helps get the PCs re-elected. Too bad that so many AB voters were fooled by it.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...