• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lack of money

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Cowman, you're sounding tired and defeated. It's not a foregone conclusion that urban sprawl has to consume outlaying land. It's bad government that lets it happen. For two-hundred years, this country focussed on establishing the infrastructure that would extend civilization into the wilderness. In the latter half of this century, centralization has been on the agenda, with the mass of development focussed at the border. This is making the nation very vulnerable, given that the more agricultural land we cover with concrete, the more we have to rely on other nations for our food.

    Talk of 'sustainable' economics is pointless, without urban sprawl management. Here's a prime example: Toronto Island Airport. Would it really inconvenience a traveler to spend another half hour being shuttled from an airport in Vaughan or King? Here's another: The Village of Port McNicoll on Georgian Bay has one of the largest grain elevators in the world. It's retired, the rail system has been ripped out and the lakers don't even pass by Port McNicoll anymore. If Kellogs or General Mills or Canada Breads had have located there, the story would have a very different ending. So, why wasn't the infrastucture built to support something like this? According to a municipal councillor, 'working' toward economic development in the township, if such an opportunity did arise, he would support location in the neighbouring municipality, where urban growth was already in existence.

    The more centralized we become, the denser the pollution and the higher the disease rate and the more we need high-density nutrients in the food we eat. I don't think the organic and functional food trends are fads anymore than botted water or dietary suppliments are. Let's hope that alternative economics arise fast enough to keep up with the health problems that develop from conventional ones!

    Comment


      #12
      tersta: In an ideal world we would save the good land and build houses on the garbage land, however that is not reality...you know it and so do I!
      In my municipality there is a lot of talk about a task force on land use. While they dither and wax poetic about the rural way of life the housing projects continue to consume the best land in the county. They turn around and build a dump on three of the best quarter sections around. A creek runs right through this dump and empties into the river just up from the water treatment plant for the city! Go figure.
      In spite of my desire to not see my farmland turned into an urban playground, when they come knocking with their checkbook in hand, I'll be selling! Why? Because if I don't the next guy who owns it will!
      Is that the wrong way to think? My great grandfather bought this land from the CPR. It's mine now but I have an obligation to get the most out of it for the generations down the road. It is my duty to get the maximum value out of it and quite frankly agriculture is just not going to do that! I believe we must all manage our assets in the way we see as best. That is our right as a landowner.

      Comment


        #13
        If the farm wasn't paying off, I would do the same.

        Comment

        • Reply to this Thread
        • Return to Topic List
        Working...