dml whats your opinion on how it all started ? if people knew the truth every choice gets a lot simpler , eg for me man made virus no 💉, natural virus mabe
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
who here still believes the bat soup story ?
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
Originally posted by Jordy2323 View PostIn MB, the fully vaxxed (2 doses) account for equal/or higher cases, hospitalizations, ICU and deaths than their per capita.
So that would be some negative efficacy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by cropgrower View Postdml whats your opinion on how it all started ? if people knew the truth every choice gets a lot simpler , eg for me man made virus no 💉, natural virus mabeLast edited by dmlfarmer; Mar 3, 2022, 16:37.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dmlfarmer View PostNo, not negative efficacy, bad spin. Had you put up the next chart in the series of charts on the manitoba website it would have shown there is no negative efficacy. However, that next chart does not support your claim therefore you ignored it. So let me put it up for you.
Right there in the data.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jordy2323 View PostThere is no spin. The double vaxxed (Fully vaxxed) have covid stats disproportionate to their population.
Right there in the data.
just like the math challenged who compare 1/3and 1/4and think since 3 is less than 4 then 1/3 must be smaller than 1/4, you are only comparing the numerators of the fractions.
In this case, in calculating the ratios and thereby the risk, the denominators are not the same for vaccination status. You have to first calculate the number of people in each group to determine the risk fractions. That is not done in the two charts provided. However you can calculate it from the charts. And if you do that you will find that cases, hospitalizations, and deaths the highest risk is 1 shot, then 0 shots, then 2 shots, and then3 shots. The one shot higher risk may be partially explained by the low number of people who only got one shot. This calculation is confirmed by the chart which you ignored, but which I posted. As well, this reflects the same findings as the CDC charts I posted.Last edited by dmlfarmer; Mar 3, 2022, 22:01.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dmlfarmer View PostMy opinion is just that, an opinion as there is no way to definitively prove or disprove yet. And anyone claiming to know the "truth" is either lying or an idiot.
Forage farmer has been calling me all sorts of names when I suggest there isn't enough evidence to form an intractable opinion on any evolving topic. I trust he will be along shortly to harass you for daring to suggest the same.
Don't you know that we all need to be blind ideologues, 100% committed to our opinions, evidence be damned?
What a fun place this would be if we were all just like Chuck...Last edited by AlbertaFarmer5; Mar 4, 2022, 17:15.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TSIPP View PostWhat I’d like to know is how many people die after the shot, it’s a big number that nobody talks about.
Canada has administered more than 62 Million vaccinations. Globally there has been 10.8 Billion vaccinations. Surely if the vaccine was a deadly as you seem to believe, there would have been a huge number of deaths, Where are all these big numbers of deaths you claim.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TSIPP View PostYou’ve got to know someone that died a couple weeks after the clot shot, maybe you’re in denial!
And still the only person I know of who has died of Covid was almost a hundred.
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment