U.S. Supreme Court leak; Roe v. Wade overturned

[WiltonRanch]

Hey. We’re in Canada. You don’t have to worry a bit. Our evil and immoral society will keep on keeping on as it has and does forever and beyond. Us terrible “religious” people will stay just that. Ostracized as idiots by the prevailing will of society.

Which brings me to this point. The majority, if it holds a specific viewpoint is certainly not necessarily right.

In this case, the issue could not be more clear. A child is killed because it messes with the plans and dreams of the selfish. A person is killed. It’s not disputable. Is it?

Are you implying religious morality has more precedence than democratic will? Don’t go there.

[Sheepwheat]

Are you implying religious morality has more precedence than democratic will? Don’t go there.

Killing humans has nothing do do with “religion” does it? If so, you too are “religious”. Unless you are pro murder?

I am very anti abortion. That doesn’t mean I get to run for office, and touch the issue with a ten foot pole, if the majority of society is depraved of moral values. Values which you don’t need “religion” to even have. Harper, Manning, and others did not touch it, because sadly it would be political suicide.

Now. The answer to my question? Is abortion killing a human, yes or no?

Is murder only wrong if you are a “religious nut job” like myself? Or is murder generally wrong?

Funny how the left can impose things on the right, but not the other way around, btw. The wheat board, climate cultism, gay “marriage”, abortion. But if a conservative has views or wishes to try to change things morally, it’s oh, so wrong.

[WiltonRanch]

Killing humans has nothing do do with “religion” does it? If so, you too are “religious”. Unless you are pro murder?

I am very anti abortion. That doesn’t mean I get to run for office, and touch the issue with a ten foot pole, if the majority of society is depraved of moral values. Values which you don’t need “religion” to even have. Harper, Manning, and others did not touch it, because sadly it would be political suicide.

Now. The answer to my question? Is abortion killing a human, yes or no?

Is murder only wrong if you are a “religious nut job” like myself? Or is murder generally wrong?

Funny how the left can impose things on the right, but not the other way around, btw. The wheat board, climate cultism, gay “marriage”, abortion. But if a conservative has views or wishes to try to change things morally, it’s oh, so wrong.

Think when we start discussing legal matters and religion together we can start contradicting ourselves and look hypocritical. What keeps western liberal democracies from descending into theocratic hell holes is a separation of church and state and the rule of law. Sure Harper didn’t agree with abortion but he also respected the rule of law which was tested in the courts. I can understand your convictions and beliefs here. Personally I’m not a fan of it neither. Goes against being a human but I don’t have a vagina.

[agstar77]

Hey. We’re in Canada. You don’t have to worry a bit. Our evil and immoral society will keep on keeping on as it has and does forever and beyond. Us terrible “religious” people will stay just that. Ostracized as idiots by the prevailing will of society.

Which brings me to this point. The majority, if it holds a specific viewpoint is certainly not necessarily right.

In this case, the issue could not be more clear. A child is killed because it messes with the plans and dreams of the selfish. A person is killed. It’s not disputable. Is it?

You would probably be happier in the moral religious society in Afghanistan. They treat women in a religious fashion you would like, where they have no rights.

[Sheepwheat]

You would probably be happier in the moral religious society in Afghanistan. They treat women in a religious fashion you would like, where they have no rights.

Wow. Unreal.

[foragefarmer]

Sort of like covid eh. No questions. Just trust the science.

75M babies aborted every year and you start using gender as a shield to asking any sort of question about anything. Thats so weak.

Several states are trying to pass post birth abortion legislation. So glad the USSC stopped this insanity.

If women are so empowered then get down to your doctor and get some birth control or tie your tubes or whatever. Dont make a baby pay for your stupidity masking as choice. And yes the male partner absolutely has a say in this because because by the courts, he is designated as provider financially for a living child, then he has a rights during an abortion as well.

There is more of a fuss made against cutting old growth forest or baby seals than ending babies lives. Just sick.

Jazz, nice job of putting the onus solely on the women for an unwanted pregnancy. No such thing as putting a condom on?

If your suggesting a women gets her tubes tied, maybe some of your so called male partners should get their balls snipped if they want to f uck anything with two legs. But in your case it's all up to the women.

As for the guy having a say, that's why there's so many single mothers and children with no support from the deadbeat dads that don't man up and take responsibility.

Canadian Social Programs stretched to the maximum, you know the ones you and your Social Conservative buddies want cut so badly.

Still wondering why your in Canada Jazz!

[jazz]

So which is the better protection forage. Taking a pill once a day when you are in a lucid state, or fumbling around with some guy in the dark after the bar closes.

When a male pill is made, it should be given freely to that group as well. Maybe we can get Moderna or Pfizer to fast track that for us. They seem to be on to something with their vaccines.

There is a morning after pill available that will terminate your pregnancy chemically up to 6-8 weeks after. Should know by that time if he is a keeper or not.

[blackpowder]

Ahhhh. First trimester abortion okay then.

[blackpowder]

Huh? Who wants to cut care for kids allowed to be born?

And what about the social conservative females?

If only more knew of the lack of support.

[blackpowder]

I said it before. Abortion is the second oldest profession. Do we want it in the back alleys again?

[Sheepwheat]

I said it before. Abortion is the second oldest profession. Do we want it in the back alleys again?

Was it ever literally in the back alleys? If so, wasn’t everything in the back alleys, from dental to health care.

If needed, yes, it needs to be safe. And yes, there are those rare times, sadly, when it is a distinct necessity.

[blackpowder]

Was it ever literally in the back alleys? If so, wasn’t everything in the back alleys, from dental to health care.

If needed, yes, it needs to be safe. And yes, there are those rare times, sadly, when it is a distinct necessity.

It would seem we study different histories. Or incomplete versions. Underground, illegal activities seldom safest.