Originally posted by chuckChuck
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What We Learned From Hating The Unvaccinated
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
-
I am vaccinated with 2 shots. The 2nd one a full year ago now. Once they opened it up for people to get a 3rd shot was when I personally experienced discrimination from a small group of a friends that met weekly. When I found out that they continued to meet without informing or including 2 of us, I had to say something. We were not unvaccinated. Fear is a huge barrier to break through. Disrespect I have a hard time getting over.
I decided not to get a 3rd shot at that time because I took a Covid-19 antibody test 8 months out from the 2nd shot and scored positive for SARS-CoV-2 Spike glycoprotein at >250 U/ml the highest that can be presently detected. If your score is in excess of 250 U/ml, your likelihood of reinfection is extremely low. I had not been sick with anything since January of 2020 when I was extremely sick for 3 weeks and had all the symptoms of covid. So, did I get antibodies from infection or from the vaccine? Your guess is as good as mine. Testing was done at the Mayo Clinic through Ichor Labs out of Edmonton.
Comment
-
The vaccine never worked littledoggie. You can go into pfizers data and find measurable efficacy waning drastically after just a few weeks. We were all had and its too bad your group of friends wont figure that out. My parents neither. Cant face the fact that the govt fcked it up and then lied. They are still lying.
People with 3 shots getting covid twice now. Thats just nuts. Only chuck will defend this anymore because its the only open avenue to his marxist utopia.
IMO Trudeau getting covid is just laying the ground work to remove the mandates. Its all fake. Has to make something up to change the science before the Canada Day protests kick in.
Comment
-
-
Vaccinated getting Covid over and over again. Just this weekend friend DV&B third time for him, quite ill, can’t breath and chest pain, then daughter of other friend caught it for fourth time on plane. I haven’t heard many NVers that had even one very mild, and even non-symptomatic case the entire time. Brother and wife are hell-bent on Ivermectin never caught it once despite housing two university students and constant NV traffic in and out every day. Go Figure! Just sayin, seems odd that DV&B are so prone to recurrent Covid.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sheepwheat View PostGo find it yourself. It’s really quite simple. If you’re too simple…..
Here is what Alberta Health Services said about Ivermectin for covid 19.
https://www.albertahealthservices.ca/assets/info/ppih/if-ppih-covid-19-sag-ivermectin-in-treatment-and-prevention-rapid-review.pdf
Ivermectin Evidence Review Update Oct 5, 2021, AHS Scientific Advisory Group
The AHS Scientific Advisory Group (SAG) and the COVID-19 The****utics Working Group
continue to monitor new evidence on ivermectin. After review there continues to be insufficient
evidence of benefit, and the previous recommendations continue to be upheld:
• At this time, ivermectin should not be prescribed or taken to prevent or treat COVID-19
(outside of a clinical trial, although SAG is currently not aware of ongoing trials in
Alberta).
The SAG and the The****utics Working Group will continue to monitor and assess new
evidence on ivermectin as it is published. Several high quality randomized controlled trials are
being conducted to further study the use of ivermectin for COVID-19; this review and
recommendations will be updated as new evidence comes to light.
Since the previous reviews, there were two significant updates on the evidence for ivermectin
use in COVID-19 that SAG would like to comment on:
1. Guidelines and Evidence Review Update: Fraudulent Data Withdrawn
A recent Cochrane systematic review by Popp et al. (July 2021) is in alignment with AHS and
other jurisdictions (including the US National Institutes of Health, the World Health Organization,
Health Canada, and the US Food & Drug Administration. It concludes that the reliable evidence
available to date does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-
19 (outside of well-designed randomized trials). The authors found that the available studies
varied widely in the dosages used, the other medications included as comparators, and the
outcomes examined, and that many of the studies were at high risk of bias (meaning any
differences noted across groups were likely due to other factors).
Comment
-
Originally posted by chuckChuck View PostSince you were to lame to produce any study on ivermectin I will do your homework and save you the trouble.
Here is what Alberta Health Services said about Ivermectin for covid 19.
https://www.albertahealthservices.ca/assets/info/ppih/if-ppih-covid-19-sag-ivermectin-in-treatment-and-prevention-rapid-review.pdf
Ivermectin Evidence Review Update Oct 5, 2021, AHS Scientific Advisory Group
The AHS Scientific Advisory Group (SAG) and the COVID-19 The****utics Working Group
continue to monitor new evidence on ivermectin. After review there continues to be insufficient
evidence of benefit, and the previous recommendations continue to be upheld:
• At this time, ivermectin should not be prescribed or taken to prevent or treat COVID-19
(outside of a clinical trial, although SAG is currently not aware of ongoing trials in
Alberta).
The SAG and the The****utics Working Group will continue to monitor and assess new
evidence on ivermectin as it is published. Several high quality randomized controlled trials are
being conducted to further study the use of ivermectin for COVID-19; this review and
recommendations will be updated as new evidence comes to light.
Since the previous reviews, there were two significant updates on the evidence for ivermectin
use in COVID-19 that SAG would like to comment on:
1. Guidelines and Evidence Review Update: Fraudulent Data Withdrawn
A recent Cochrane systematic review by Popp et al. (July 2021) is in alignment with AHS and
other jurisdictions (including the US National Institutes of Health, the World Health Organization,
Health Canada, and the US Food & Drug Administration. It concludes that the reliable evidence
available to date does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-
19 (outside of well-designed randomized trials). The authors found that the available studies
varied widely in the dosages used, the other medications included as comparators, and the
outcomes examined, and that many of the studies were at high risk of bias (meaning any
differences noted across groups were likely due to other factors).
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment