Overturned.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Roe v. Wade
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
Tags: None
-
Originally posted by sumdumguy View PostTrudeau calls the reversal of Roe, “horrificâ€. You know what’s horrific?
Horrific "we" can't KILL those disgusting inconvenient babies, Biden admitted as much, "babies" he accidently truthfully spoke those words.
Take a good look at your kids/grandkids you Liberal/NDP types...which should have been SNUFFED out! A unwanted child is just as HUMAN as a wanted.
Wife and grandson were possibly unwanted unplanned...
Hope a reasoning BRAIN develops in the LEFT heads!
My rant for 50 years. Will be prayers of thanks giving from me...
Comment
-
-
Roe v. Wade’s fall sets a ‘frightening precedent,’ retired Canadian Supreme Court justice says
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/world/article-roe-v-wade-supreme-court-ruling/
“I think this is a perfect decision for the 18th century,†Rosalie Abella, who is now the Samuel and Judith Pisar Visiting Professor at Harvard Law School, said in an interview. Ms. Abella retired last summer after 17 years on the Supreme Court of Canada.
Earlier this week, the U.S. Supreme Court expanded religious rights to public funding of schools, and gun rights in striking down a New York law that put strict controls on carrying a concealed gun in public.
“They seem to be on a tear to expand religious and gun rights, in the name of freedom,†Ms. Abella said. “They are not, however, prepared to extend that freedom to women.
A country full of people who love to take away the freedom of women and minorities forcing women to have children, even sometimes in the cases of incest and ****. And at the same time do almost nothing to stop mass shootings of children?
Only in the good ole USA where a large majority of voters agree that health care and reproductive health should be a woman's choice.
Many states are going backwards with the Christian taliban lite running the show.
What could be next? Contraception rights? Gay marriage?
Comment
-
Originally posted by chuckChuck View PostRoe v. Wade’s fall sets a ‘frightening precedent,’ retired Canadian Supreme Court justice says
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/world/article-roe-v-wade-supreme-court-ruling/
“I think this is a perfect decision for the 18th century,†Rosalie Abella, who is now the Samuel and Judith Pisar Visiting Professor at Harvard Law School, said in an interview. Ms. Abella retired last summer after 17 years on the Supreme Court of Canada.
Earlier this week, the U.S. Supreme Court expanded religious rights to public funding of schools, and gun rights in striking down a New York law that put strict controls on carrying a concealed gun in public.
“They seem to be on a tear to expand religious and gun rights, in the name of freedom,†Ms. Abella said. “They are not, however, prepared to extend that freedom to women.
A country full of people who love to take away the freedom of women and minorities forcing women to have children, even sometimes in the cases of incest and ****. And at the same time do almost nothing to stop mass shootings of children?
Only in the good ole USA where a large majority of voters agree that health care and reproductive health should be a woman's choice.
Many states are going backwards with the Christian taliban lite running the show.
What could be next? Contraception rights? Gay marriage?
LOL!!!
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment