• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

As long as I have a fire I guess

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31

    Poor chucky
    You sure have patience AB5
    But I think your fighting a losing battle lol
    Last edited by Guest; Oct 24, 2022, 12:24.

    Comment


      #32
      Click image for larger version

Name:	40DC6FE0-C2F9-4BA5-80A3-F08EE25763D7.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	8.5 KB
ID:	773960

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by caseih View Post
        [ATTACH]11253[/ATTACH]
        Let's try an example that Chuck might be able to understand.
        In an effort to freeze Chuck out of the basement, in the faint hope that he will move out and get a real job, his mother turns the thermostat down by 1° every day. Chuck types 5% slower for every degree below 30C.
        But the law of unintended consequences applies, and his overheated commodore 64 computer is able to perform cut and paste 5% slower for every degree above minus 10C.Because Chuck is almost incapable of typing out his own original thoughts, and relies almost exclusively on cut and paste which he does not comprehend, assume that 80% of his content is cut and paste, while the remaining 20% requires typing skills.

        At what optimum temperature will Chuck be able to create the most troll posts per morning shift?

        And for bonus points, from the perspective of chucks poor mother, what is the optimum temperature which will limit his posting abilities enough to force him to move out?
        Last edited by AlbertaFarmer5; Oct 24, 2022, 13:50.

        Comment


          #34
          Considering the hilarious thread title where Chuck has the audacity to question is Saskatchewan premiers math abilities, I assume the above math question should be simple for him to perform.

          Hilarious in the context of every post he has ever made about alternative energy, all of which required suspending all of the laws of mathematics and physics. My personal favorite being how he justifies the cost of solar panels because they cost the same amount as a new pickup truck. That is the industry standard for calculating the ROI on an investment.

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
            Considering the hilarious thread title where Chuck has the audacity to question is Saskatchewan premiers math abilities, I assume the above math question should be simple for him to perform.

            Hilarious in the context of every post he has ever made about alternative energy, all of which required suspending all of the laws of mathematics and physics. My personal favorite being how he justifies the cost of solar panels because they cost the same amount as a new pickup truck. That is the industry standard for calculating the ROI on an investment.
            It’s like certain cults/religions which have unsuccessfully predicted revelation down to the day. People still follow blindly

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by WiltonRanch View Post
              It’s like certain cults/religions which have unsuccessfully predicted revelation down to the day. People still follow blindly
              You wouldn't dare to draw parallels to all of the countless failed prophecies of the climate cult would you?

              Comment


                #37
                The only math I wish to see, is how many tonnes of carbon has the carbon tax removed from the atmosphere.

                When you do something that is supposed to have an impact and effect that you are after, why is it an impossible numbers for the alarmists to give?

                Comment


                  #38
                  yep , no problem telling exactly how much is there , or how much something emits (excepting cement plants in keebek , they emit 0)
                  or blood soaked oil from the middle east , it arrives with no emissions, pristine almost
                  or the coal living BC, clean , no problem

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
                    You wouldn't dare to draw parallels to all of the countless failed prophecies of the climate cult would you?
                    Maybe 🤔

                    Comment


                      #40
                      We are still waiting on DA5 to tell us how much better life on earth would be if we just went back to pliocene, 5.3 - 2.6 million years ago.

                      The pliocene was last time CO2 concentrations were above 400ppm and the earths average temperature was 7 degrees F warmer and the ice caps just about melted completely.

                      This is just like his other bonehead ideas that we are going to run short of CO2 if we don't keep burning fossil fuels and that we need coal pollution in the atmosphere to make it rain.

                      DA5's idea that everything will be fine under a pliocene climate and not to worry about rising CO2 levels is the exact opposite of what every credible scientific organization and institution is saying.

                      But DA5 the class clown can't seem to provide a shred of credible of scientific evidence to backup his wild and crazy ideas. No surprise there. Because none exists. But that doesn't stop him. He's a follower of the new "alternative facts". LOL

                      Comment


                        #41
                        Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
                        We are still waiting on DA5 to tell us how much better life on earth would be if we just went back to pliocene, 5.3 - 2.6 million years ago.

                        The pliocene was last time CO2 concentrations were above 400ppm and the earths average temperature was 7 degrees F warmer and the ice caps just about melted completely.

                        This is just like his other bonehead ideas that we are going to run short of CO2 if we don't keep burning fossil fuels and that we need coal pollution in the atmosphere to make it rain.

                        DA5's idea that everything will be fine under a pliocene climate and not to worry about rising CO2 levels is the exact opposite of what every credible scientific organization and institution is saying.

                        But DA5 the class clown can't seem to provide a shred of credible of scientific evidence to backup his wild and crazy ideas. No surprise there. Because none exists. But that doesn't stop him. He's a follower of the new "alternative facts". LOL
                        I am confused Chuck2, according to Berkeley.edu “The Pliocene, 5.3 to 2.6 million years ago, was a time of global cooling after the warmer Miocene.”

                        The Pliocene lasted 2.7 million years yet climate alarmists tell us we only have 10 years to save the planet. History would tell us the climate alarmists are wrong! Lol!

                        Comment


                          #42
                          JW’s predicted end of the world 30 times. Kind of coincided with head office getting short on funds. Bit of a parallel there? Jonestown Solar Temple Heavens gate predicted their ends and made it a reality. Some of the alarmists are embarking on a self fulfilling prophecy intentional or not.

                          Comment


                            #43
                            Originally posted by Hamloc View Post
                            we only have 10 years to save the planet.
                            More like we have 10 yrs to fool enough retards in society into adopting marxism.

                            Comment


                              #44
                              Originally posted by Hamloc View Post
                              I am confused Chuck2, according to Berkeley.edu “The Pliocene, 5.3 to 2.6 million years ago, was a time of global cooling after the warmer Miocene.”

                              The Pliocene lasted 2.7 million years yet climate alarmists tell us we only have 10 years to save the planet. History would tell us the climate alarmists are wrong! Lol!
                              oh these damn facts , poor chuckles?

                              Comment


                                #45
                                Originally posted by Hamloc View Post
                                I am confused Chuck2, according to Berkeley.edu “The Pliocene, 5.3 to 2.6 million years ago, was a time of global cooling after the warmer Miocene.”

                                The Pliocene lasted 2.7 million years yet climate alarmists tell us we only have 10 years to save the planet. History would tell us the climate alarmists are wrong! Lol!
                                Chuck seems to be avoiding trying to explain why every previous era with warm temperatures and the resulting high levels of CO2 were described as optimum by scientists. Yet if the same conditions were to occur in the modern era it would apocalyptic.

                                And keep in mind that it was Chuck himself who brought the word optimum into the conversation in the first place. Then spent every subsequent post arguing with himself.

                                When your belief system requires that you have to rewrite history and prehistory, it may be time to consider that it may be your belief system that is wrong, and not the historical facts.

                                Comment

                                • Reply to this Thread
                                • Return to Topic List
                                Working...