As long as I have a fire I guess

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Chuck, you just keep regurgitating the same talking point about sea levels over and over and over. Why do you think that would be bad for life on earth?
Or are you so selfish that the only life on Earth that matters is humans and our infrastructure?
Does optimum conditions for all of life on Earth not outweigh your concerns about the temporary irresponsibly located human infrastructure?
How much would Earth's carrying capacity increase as a result of higher sea levels, higher temperatures, and the resulting higher CO2 levels?
Perhaps you could take it one step further and tell us what the optimum level of CO2 and optimum temperature would be for all of life on earth?
What is the optimum sea level? Life has survived a huge range of sea levels throughout history, which is the right one?

[chuckChuck]

DA5 you do really think that human caused climate change is the way to go and the pliocene would come with no costs only benefits? LMAO

[Hamloc]

DA5 you do really think that human caused climate change is the way to go and the pliocene would come with no costs only benefits? LMAO

Again, the Pliocene period lasted 2.7 million years. You are describing a period 6000 years long at 280 ppm of C02. It would appear to me that the 6000 year period is the aberration not the 2.7 million year period! You are concerned about the disappearance of glaciers, we’re they not created by the ice age, by global cooling, it is logical that glaciers didn’t exist during the Pliocene. Also humans didn’t exist during the Pliocene period, where did the elevated levels of C02 come from and where did they disappear to for this 6000 year period of low C02 levels?

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Temperatures then averaged 7 degrees Fahrenheit higher than in pre-industrial times, and studies indicate that large forests occupied today’s Arctic tundra." [/B]

Forests instead of tundra. I wonder which supports more life? Almost sounds as if the habitable areas of earth expanded during the previous optimal period. The elevated levels of beneficial CO2 would be a large factor in expanding the habitable areas as well.
Do you proofread, or even read your cut and paste to make sure they don't contradict your position?
Apparently you thought that point was so important that you even put it in bold. I often wonder whose side you are really on.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

I must have missed the post where Chuck explained all of the acronyms he uses. I did manage to figure out LOL all by myself, and Lots Of Love back at you chuck.
But I cannot figure out what da5 stands for.
Google says it is a single seat sport airplane, a war movie or an OBD1 electrical adapter.
Any of which make about as much sense as the rest of his posts.

[cropgrower]

[furrowtickler]

At the speed of science

[sumdumguy]

Elon Musk( the richest man on the planet) is gonna make quick work of criminal google. Suppress that you morons!

[WiltonRanch]

I must have missed the post where Chuck explained all of the acronyms he uses. I did manage to figure out LOL all by myself, and Lots Of Love back at you chuck.
But I cannot figure out what da5 stands for.
Google says it is a single seat sport airplane, a war movie or an OBD1 electrical adapter.
Any of which make about as much sense as the rest of his posts.

It’s his slight at you.

[Landdownunder]

glad I unblocked glenn.

venture over here to rural issues to see the too and fro.

you guys give me humour and glenn even cracked one "hell froze over"

good to see mate