Doctors say 'fossil fuel addiction' kills, starves millions

[Guest]

Yes, I don't think they thought this one through fully. If only all of the plagues and pestilence came with their own built-in self destruction feature and best before date like this one has. I guess that's why they are so determined to infect the schools.
We have made an attempt to do our part, 10 grandkids in the generation below me. My neighbor is working on number kid number 12 I believe.

Considering the collapsing demographics due to people not having children, when society no longer has enough able bodies to take care of the elderly, regardless of how much they might try to tax the working generation, society will likely revert to the model that served as well for most of history, where the younger generations look after the older generations. All these people who didn't have any children may have some regrets.

but, but , they have dogs ?

[Landdownunder]

must be a new sport taking the Mickey out of one bloke on here.

far exceeds the boundaries of Agriville.

[chuckChuck]

Air pollution from fossil fuels does indeed kill millions of people world wide.

The heat dome which hit BC in 2021 also killed several hundred vulnerable people.

And more frequent extreme weather events like the heat dome are a feature of human caused climate change so say the climate scientists.

[fjlip]

For crying out loud! Make up sh it, lies, false claims, certainty CBC has washed you thoroughly. Human influence is SFA and we know it!

[chuckChuck]

So flipper show us the credible science from a credible source that says humans have little influence on climate change and that rising greenhouse gases don't matter. We are waiting.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

So flipper show us the credible science from a credible source that says humans have little influence on climate change and that rising greenhouse gases don't matter. We are waiting.

Chuck, quick gas lighting. No one anywhere claims that rising CO2 doesn't matter.
The evidence that rising CO2 has increased yields and drought tolerance and water use efficiency and caused greening of the Earth is irrefutable.

[chuckChuck]

Tell Flipper that! He seems to think humans have no influence over climate.

Glad to see that you agree that humans are changing the climate with increasing CO2 levels! You are making progress!

[jazz]

Tell Flipper that! He seems to think humans have no influence over climate.

Humans have no influence over climate. They are apparently easily influences by marxist propaganda, just like you chuck.



During the Jurassic Period (200 mya), average CO2 concentrations were about 1800 ppm or about 4.7 times higher than today.

The highest concentrations of CO2 during all of the Paleozoic Era occurred during the Cambrian Period, nearly 7000 ppm -- about 18 times higher than today.

The Carboniferous Period and the Ordovician Period were the only geological periods during the Paleozoic Era when global temperatures were as low as they are today. To the consternation of global warming proponents, the Late Ordovician Period was also an Ice Age while at the same time CO2 concentrations then were nearly 12 times higher than today-- 4400 ppm.

[Guest]

Don’t bring facts into the discussion *****

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Humans have no influence over climate. They are apparently easily influences by marxist propaganda, just like you chuck.

[ATTACH]11293[/ATTACH]

During the Jurassic Period (200 mya), average CO2 concentrations were about 1800 ppm or about 4.7 times higher than today.

The highest concentrations of CO2 during all of the Paleozoic Era occurred during the Cambrian Period, nearly 7000 ppm -- about 18 times higher than today.

The Carboniferous Period and the Ordovician Period were the only geological periods during the Paleozoic Era when global temperatures were as low as they are today. To the consternation of global warming proponents, the Late Ordovician Period was also an Ice Age while at the same time CO2 concentrations then were nearly 12 times higher than today-- 4400 ppm.

What is quite funny about the whole movement is that throughout the majority of Earth's geological history, CO2 and temperature have been inversely correlated. Only when you cherry pick a very very short period During the modern era ( and throw out or ignore or adjust all of the inconvenient data points)can you find any positive correlation.
It is however mostly true that higher temperatures will result in higher levels of CO2, at least on short time scales.