Alberta 2 grid alerts in 2 days

[chuckChuck]

Well its December again and those who think renewables don't work never aknowledge that intermittent renewables work very well for significant periods of the year without burning fossil fuels of any type thus reducing carbon emmisions which is why they are used.

Will they replace fossil sources without some sort of storage or conversion to ammonia, hydrogen, pumped hydro, or batteries? No and we have known that for a long time.

In Quebec and Manitoba renewable hydro covers nearly all their electricity needs.

Renewable Hydro works nearly 100% of the time. Canada's electricity supply is made up of 60% renewable hydro already.

Wind and solar are very low cost options to supplement the electricity supply.

In some paces the wind blows nearly all the time and can provide a relatively steady supply of electricity. Both the UK and Denmark have a lot of wind capacity. So do several of the maritime provinces have lots of wind capacity to be devloped.

Alberta is installing very significant amounts of solar and wind because it makes economic sense.

Do you really think the AESO can't manage the supply with so many intermittments?

You would think they have a plan to make sure it works before the let it get installed? Nah that wouldn't make sense would it? LOL

[chuckChuck]

Oh oh storage for renewables! Who said they would support renewables once storage became feasible? Oh yeah it was our resident Libertarian wanna be republican separatist supporter of diagolon. LOL

Nova Scotia’s EverWind signs green ammonia deal with Germany’s Uniper

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-nova-scotia-everwind-green-ammonia-uniper/

EverWind Fuels, a private developer of sustainable hydrogen and ammonia production in Nova Scotia, says it has signed a memorandum of understanding for Germany-based Uniper to purchase green ammonia from the company’s production facility in Point Tupper, N.S.

The companies have an offtake agreement for 500,000 tonnes a year of green ammonia.

EverWind says it has an offtake agreement with the German company E.ON Hydrogen, a wholly owned subsidiary of the energy company EON, for about the same amount of ammonia a year.

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau will sign an accord in Stephenville, N.L., today aimed at encouraging exports of hydrogen to Germany. Germany sees hydrogen as a primary long-term replacement for Russian natural gas and as a way to meet its goal to fulfill all its electricity needs with supplies from renewable sources by 2035.

Point Tupper is described by EverWind as a multiphase green hydrogen and ammonia production and export facility, “which is in advanced stages of development and is expected to reach commercial operation in early 2025.”

[Hamloc]

Oh oh storage for renewables! Who said they would support renewables once storage became feasible? Oh yeah it was our resident Libertarian wanna be republican separatist supporter of diagolon. LOL

Nova Scotia’s EverWind signs green ammonia deal with Germany’s Uniper

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-nova-scotia-everwind-green-ammonia-uniper/

EverWind Fuels, a private developer of sustainable hydrogen and ammonia production in Nova Scotia, says it has signed a memorandum of understanding for Germany-based Uniper to purchase green ammonia from the company’s production facility in Point Tupper, N.S.

The companies have an offtake agreement for 500,000 tonnes a year of green ammonia.

EverWind says it has an offtake agreement with the German company E.ON Hydrogen, a wholly owned subsidiary of the energy company EON, for about the same amount of ammonia a year.

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau will sign an accord in Stephenville, N.L., today aimed at encouraging exports of hydrogen to Germany. Germany sees hydrogen as a primary long-term replacement for Russian natural gas and as a way to meet its goal to fulfill all its electricity needs with supplies from renewable sources by 2035.

Point Tupper is described by EverWind as a multiphase green hydrogen and ammonia production and export facility, “which is in advanced stages of development and is expected to reach commercial operation in early 2025.”

A couple of thoughts Chuck2. Why can’t Germany put up their own windmills and produce their own green ammonia? Also with the shortage of natural gas in Europe companies like Yara have reduced fertilizer production and BASF has shut a chemicals plant, why wouldn’t they use the ammonia for fertilizer? Where does the water come from to produce green ammonia and hydrogen? Fresh water is becoming an increasingly precious resource. Random thoughts, will be interested in your unrelated response.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Wind and solar are very low cost options to supplement the electricity supply.

There you go using the words low cost and wind and solar in the same sentence. I don't think that means what you think it means. Unless of course you have found an example somewhere in the world where additional solar and wind have translated into lower costs for the consumers?

[shtferbrains]

https://newatlas.com/energy/largest-green-ammonia-projects/

"If all the major green ammonia projects on our shortlist are completed on schedule, their combined production total will be more than half of today's global ammonia industry by the mid-2030s – eliminating nearly 1% of global carbon dioxide emissions."

But....

"Most of these projects are in their early stages; the rubber starts hitting the road around 2030, and some can definitely be expected to fall by the wayside and never get built."

Mostly greenfield projects at this stage . Can't find anything that is actually in production.
A few are in construction and may try start "soon".

Investment money seems to be available as we see on the east coast.

Huge amount of new ammonia production.
Basicly an normal ammonia plant that produces the Hydrogen for the H in NH3 using electricity to extract it from water (H2O).

So free water and free electricity from the sun? Right Chuck?
You better invest quick.
Lots of government support and promotion.
What could go wrong?

[Hamloc]

There you go using the words low cost and wind and solar in the same sentence. I don't think that means what you think it means. Unless of course you have found an example somewhere in the world where additional solar and wind have translated into lower costs for the consumers?

There is no doubt that this supposed decarbonization of the electrical grid has made electricity more expensive. Look at Alberta, carbon tax coal generation in to obsolescence, replace it with natural gas. Natural gas still has a carbon tax applied plus the added increase cost of natural gas subject to world pricing influence. We had roughly 5000 megawatts of coal generation, now we have almost 4500 megawatts of wind and solar. Coal ran historically around 85% capacity, wind is supposedly 35% on average and solar I have to be honest I don’t know exact numbers but I believe in the neighborhood of 20%. Wind and solar require full 100% duplication to account for intermittentcy, increasing electricity cost and eliminating any supposed cost savings. Those building solar make lots of money selling carbon credits. All charges related to carbon taxation and carbon credits increase the cost of electricity. This fantasy of cheap renewable electricity is just that a fantasy!!!

[furrowtickler]

There is no doubt that this supposed decarbonization of the electrical grid has made electricity more expensive. Look at Alberta, carbon tax coal generation in to obsolescence, replace it with natural gas. Natural gas still has a carbon tax applied plus the added increase cost of natural gas subject to world pricing influence. We had roughly 5000 megawatts of coal generation, now we have almost 4500 megawatts of wind and solar. Coal ran historically around 85% capacity, wind is supposedly 35% on average and solar I have to be honest I don’t know exact numbers but I believe in the neighborhood of 20%. Wind and solar require full 100% duplication to account for intermittentcy, increasing electricity cost and eliminating any supposed cost savings. Those building solar make lots of money selling carbon credits. All charges related to carbon taxation and carbon credits increase the cost of electricity. This fantasy of cheap renewable electricity is just that a fantasy!!!

And certainly not green to produce from the raw materials needs

[WiltonRanch]

Well its December again and those who think renewables don't work never aknowledge that intermittent renewables work very well for significant periods of the year without burning fossil fuels of any type thus reducing carbon emmisions which is why they are used.

Will they replace fossil sources without some sort of storage or conversion to ammonia, hydrogen, pumped hydro, or batteries? No and we have known that for a long time.

In Quebec and Manitoba renewable hydro covers nearly all their electricity needs.

Renewable Hydro works nearly 100% of the time. Canada's electricity supply is made up of 60% renewable hydro already.

Wind and solar are very low cost options to supplement the electricity supply.

In some paces the wind blows nearly all the time and can provide a relatively steady supply of electricity. Both the UK and Denmark have a lot of wind capacity. So do several of the maritime provinces have lots of wind capacity to be devloped.

Alberta is installing very significant amounts of solar and wind because it makes economic sense.

Do you really think the AESO can't manage the supply with so many intermittments?

You would think they have a plan to make sure it works before the let it get installed? Nah that wouldn't make sense would it? LOL

Think your kids will be putting flowers on your gravestone before green ammonia becomes a thing. In the event it does come to fruition wouldn’t it make more sense to use it for fertilizer than use for energy? There’s a push to reduce carbon emissions in ag this would be a great way to help out.

[Guest]

Poor chucky
So many details
WTF guys ?
You know the rules ???

[Guest]

One more chuckles
If hydro so good how come we can’t build any more ?
Tobin and codette lakes are a godsend to this area
They *** near crucified PC’s for building rafferty/alameda just for irrigation
You know , Roy’s boys ?

[jazz]

Alberta FF literally holding up the grid in western Canada today. Solar = zero

[chuckChuck]

There you go using the words low cost and wind and solar in the same sentence. I don't think that means what you think it means. Unless of course you have found an example somewhere in the world where additional solar and wind have translated into lower costs for the consumers?

According to the IEA and IRENA renewables are the lowest cost generation sources in many parts of the world. Of course there are other costs but when comparing generation costs per kwh they win. So how can you ignore their cost advantage when used strategically?

Now its your turn to prove with credible evidence that the only reason prices for consumers have risen is because of renewables. Good luck! We are waiting. And your arm chair opinions are not evidence! LOL

https://www.irena.org/News/pressreleases/2022/Jul/Renewable-Power-Remains-Cost-Competitive-amid-Fossil-Fuel-Crisis

New IRENA report shows almost two-thirds of renewable power added in 2021 had lower costs than the cheapest coal-fired options in G20 countries.

Abu Dhabi, UAE, 13 July 2022 – Costs for renewables continued to fall in 2021 as supply chain challenges and rising commodity prices have yet to show their full impact on project costs. The cost of electricity from onshore wind fell by 15%, offshore wind by 13% and solar PV by 13% compared to 2020.

Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2021, published by the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) today, shows that almost two-thirds or 163 gigawatts (GW) of newly installed renewable power in 2021 had lower costs than the world’s cheapest coal-fired option in the G20. IRENA estimates that, given the current high fossil fuel prices, the renewable power added in 2021 saves around USD 55 billion from global energy generation costs in 2022.

IRENA’s new report confirms the critical role that cost-competitive renewables play in addressing today’s energy and climate emergencies by accelerating the transition in line with the 1.5°C warming limit and the Paris Agreement goals. Solar and wind energy, with their relatively short project lead times, represent vital planks in countries’ efforts to swiftly reduce, and eventually phase out, fossil fuels and limit the macroeconomic damages they cause in pursuit of net zero.

“Renewables are by far the cheapest form of power today,” Francesco La Camera, Director-General of IRENA said. “2022 is a stark example of just how economically viable new renewable power generation has become. Renewable power frees economies from volatile fossil fuel prices and imports, curbs energy costs and enhances market resilience – even more so if today’s energy crunch continues.”

https://www.iea.org/fuels-and-technologies/solar

Solar PV still dominates renewable energy capacity additions despite rising prices
Even with surging commodity prices increasing manufacturing costs for solar PV, its capacity additions are forecast to grow by 17% in 2021. This will set a new annual record of almost 160 GW. Solar PV alone accounts for 60% of all renewable capacity additions, with almost 1 100 GW becoming operational over the forecast period in our main case, double the rate over the previous five years. In a significant majority of countries worldwide, utility-scale solar PV is the least costly option for adding new electricity capacity, especially amid rising natural gas and coal prices. Utility-scale solar projects continue to provide over 60% of all solar PV additions worldwide. Meanwhile, policy initiatives in China, the European Union and India are boosting the deployment of commercial and residential PV projects.

[Hamloc]

According to the IEA and IRENA renewables are the lowest cost generation sources in many parts of the world. Of course there are other costs but when comparing generation costs per kwh they win. So how can you ignore their cost advantage when used strategically?

Now its your turn to prove with credible evidence that the only reason prices for consumers have risen is because of renewables. Good luck! We are waiting. And your arm chair opinions are not evidence! LOL

https://www.irena.org/News/pressreleases/2022/Jul/Renewable-Power-Remains-Cost-Competitive-amid-Fossil-Fuel-Crisis

New IRENA report shows almost two-thirds of renewable power added in 2021 had lower costs than the cheapest coal-fired options in G20 countries.

Abu Dhabi, UAE, 13 July 2022 – Costs for renewables continued to fall in 2021 as supply chain challenges and rising commodity prices have yet to show their full impact on project costs. The cost of electricity from onshore wind fell by 15%, offshore wind by 13% and solar PV by 13% compared to 2020.

Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2021, published by the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) today, shows that almost two-thirds or 163 gigawatts (GW) of newly installed renewable power in 2021 had lower costs than the world’s cheapest coal-fired option in the G20. IRENA estimates that, given the current high fossil fuel prices, the renewable power added in 2021 saves around USD 55 billion from global energy generation costs in 2022.

IRENA’s new report confirms the critical role that cost-competitive renewables play in addressing today’s energy and climate emergencies by accelerating the transition in line with the 1.5°C warming limit and the Paris Agreement goals. Solar and wind energy, with their relatively short project lead times, represent vital planks in countries’ efforts to swiftly reduce, and eventually phase out, fossil fuels and limit the macroeconomic damages they cause in pursuit of net zero.

“Renewables are by far the cheapest form of power today,” Francesco La Camera, Director-General of IRENA said. “2022 is a stark example of just how economically viable new renewable power generation has become. Renewable power frees economies from volatile fossil fuel prices and imports, curbs energy costs and enhances market resilience – even more so if today’s energy crunch continues.”

https://www.iea.org/fuels-and-technologies/solar

Solar PV still dominates renewable energy capacity additions despite rising prices
Even with surging commodity prices increasing manufacturing costs for solar PV, its capacity additions are forecast to grow by 17% in 2021. This will set a new annual record of almost 160 GW. Solar PV alone accounts for 60% of all renewable capacity additions, with almost 1 100 GW becoming operational over the forecast period in our main case, double the rate over the previous five years. In a significant majority of countries worldwide, utility-scale solar PV is the least costly option for adding new electricity capacity, especially amid rising natural gas and coal prices. Utility-scale solar projects continue to provide over 60% of all solar PV additions worldwide. Meanwhile, policy initiatives in China, the European Union and India are boosting the deployment of commercial and residential PV projects.

Here is the question Chuck2, so what if it is cheap? Watching solar power output on the AESO supply demand page, solar power is produced for roughly 8 hrs of the 24 hr day this time of year. Peak production obviously occurs between 11 am and 1 pm. It has been peaking at roughly 33% of production capacity. Between 4 pm and 7 pm is peak consumption. Solar has gone to bed by then. When it is -30 heat is the difference between life and death, that simple.

As for wind, looks like a change in weather for the weekend has brought wind generation out of its 5 day slumber. I think wind and solar are nice virtue signalling generation sources that can be added to the grid but the reality is they cannot be depended on 24 hours a day 365 days a year!!!!!

[jazz]

Talk about checking out from reality eh chuck.

Sask is done with the windmill and solar farce. It doesnt generate any baseload and even any peaking load as you can see from Ab numbers. And it can never pay for itself. Sure it works in the Sahara or outback, but not where people need the power.

There will never be another hydro dam built in this country unless perhaps Ab bails out Mb obscene budget overruns and someone can bribe the native bands enough.

Anyway, Sask is done with all that and going to an actual solution. Nuke plant being sited at Alameda or Diefenbaker.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/saskpower-smr-nuclear-1.6589247

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Here is the question Chuck2, so what if it is cheap? Watching solar power output on the AESO supply demand page, solar power is produced for roughly 8 hrs of the 24 hr day this time of year. Peak production obviously occurs between 11 am and 1 pm. It has been peaking at roughly 33% of production capacity. Between 4 pm and 7 pm is peak consumption. Solar has gone to bed by then. When it is -30 heat is the difference between life and death, that simple.

As for wind, looks like a change in weather for the weekend has brought wind generation out of its 5 day slumber. I think wind and solar are nice virtue signalling generation sources that can be added to the grid but the reality is they cannot be depended on 24 hours a day 365 days a year!!!!!

And that change in the weather just happens to be warming out of this cold snap. As we have been observing for as many years as this debate has been ongoing, wind generation is completely out of sync with power demand during the winter. On the coldest days/nights when demand is highest, the wind is nowhere to be seen. It has spent days at less than a couple of percent of capacity. Now a Chinook wind is blowing in, with that, demand drops, and generation goes up. Happens every time.