Originally posted by chuckChuck
View Post
Cheapest capacity? Is that the same thing as cheapest generation, let alone cheapest delivered to the consumer?
Keeping in mind that here in sunny Alberta, Brooks 1, the first solar farm I checked just now, has a 4 year capacity factor of 15.7%
So if it is as you claim, the cheapest electricity capacity, but it only produces at 6.5 times less than the name plate capacity, do you think it is still the cheapest generation source?
Why do you continue to embarrass yourself by posting cut and paste articles which you clearly do not even know how to interpret? Do you even attempt to read what they say, to check if they don't actually contradict your own ideological biases?
All you have to do is provide a single example of lower (relative) power bills of any place in the world, resulting from the addition of solar or wind. By far the easiest homework I have ever given you. And you have failed repeatedly for years.
Comment