Moe Declares Sask Carbon Negative

[chuckChuck]

Many Conservatives seem to be allergic to science that doesn't support their views.

Moe makes up shit and then when the science shows his bullshit, you trash the science or make up juvenile arguments like the earth is 4 billion years old and the current level of C02 is the lowest in history just after I showed you a NASA chart that showed the exact opposite.

There is no credible scientific evidence that human are not causing dramatic and relatively rapid climate change with large greenhouse gas emissions.

Give up! Nobody but the flatearther fringe is listening.

[jazz]

There is no credible scientific evidence that human are not causing dramatic and relatively rapid climate change with large greenhouse gas emissions.

CO2 4000ppm 100m yrs ago. All your evidence right there. You are just too dense to see it.

Anyway, climate is all about feelings anyway with the left. I feel we have done enough, thats end of story. Moe can declare us carbon neutral and we are done.

Or do we have to use the newly minted Sask First Act to rein in you fanatics. That works too,

[seldomseen]

Many leftists are blinded by their ideology are will ague black is white trying to prove their point.
Just a sad fact that most people live in artificial environments called cities and are easily fooled. Most farmers who live and work in the environment are not so easily fooled.

[jazz]

I am sure chuck has a double pHD in the political science of marxism.

Physics and economics, well thats another matter.

[chuckChuck]

As i was saying some Conservatives can't do science or logic.

100 million years ago that happens to be when dinosaurs walked the earth. Not particularly relevant to the last 800,000 years in earth's history is it?

No doubt you closely identify with dinosaurs! LOL

[sumdumguy]

Darrin who? Educated where? City needs environmental coordinator? What BS!

Another Greta?

[jazz]

So more cherry picked history from the climate cult again eh chuck. If 400ppm is the sweet spot for this planet, then what caused CO2 to spike 10 times what it is now when no humans were around and stay that way for millions of years.

Are you sure that whatever that process was, its not still happening. I rest my case.

We are in the lowest CO2 regime in the planets history, or do you deny that as well.

[chuckChuck]

Is 420 ppm higher than 300 ppm or lower? Just checking to see if you understand lower and higher? LOL

[Guest]

do you see what is happening in china chucky ?
the average citizen has had enough of govt horse shit
your gods time is near also
wait until people are starving and freezing in europe this winter
people have had enough of the actors, leftards, and dumb f u k i n g politicians telling us how to live
and 400 private jets flying to climate conferences , etc

[jazz]

Lets put the chart up again for the toddler. Climate cult is so exhausting. Literally fanatics running around with hair on fire covering for their own mental issues. Voting marxism all the way.

Funny how we are called science deniers from a group that thinks the earth started in 1980.

[rumrocks]

Lets put the chart up again for the toddler. Climate cult is so exhausting. Literally fanatics running around with hair on fire covering for their own mental issues. Voting marxism all the way.

Funny how we are called science deniers from a group that thinks the earth started in 1980.

[ATTACH]11557[/ATTACH]

There is no correlation between temperature and C02, however some will argue both lines are on the same chart therefore a relationship.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

There is no correlation between temperature and C02, however some will argue both lines are on the same chart therefore a relationship.

What do you mean, no correlation?

Don't you see the tiny blip on the right end of that graph? Where CO2 and temperature are moving up together. Blown all out of proportion by the logarithmic scale on the X axis? That period of correlation which represents 0.000002% of earths history. Surely that is representative of the entire history of the earth(the 99.999998% of earths history, in which that correlation did not hold true), and can be extrapolated forward with 100% confidence.

[kANOLA]

I really wonder where climate movement is going with all this.I kind of understand the thought of having a greener earth for generations to come,but at what cost.First of all is reducing CO2 really going to have an effect .Next point is reducing CO2 levels and putting nations in serious economic positions really a benefit to the next generations.

[furrowtickler]

I really wonder where climate movement is going with all this.I kind of understand the thought of having a greener earth for generations to come,but at what cost.First of all is reducing CO2 really going to have an effect .Next point is reducing CO2 levels and putting nations in serious economic positions really a benefit to the next generations.

Could not agree more

[Sheepwheat]

Like lots of things nowadays, all that needs to happen to get ppl on board is a few things.

Left wing governments

Bought off news agencies

A fake consensus of supposed experts

And then drive home a point by repeating it over and over again until the general population who can’t think for themselves believes it

It works with gm crops, organic crops, climate change, Covid protocols, that there are more than two genders, Monsanto hate, firearms hate, on and on it goes.

It is to the point now, where there is so much bs happening and the citizenry is so lost for common sense, that I don’t see it turning back until it’s too late. It is too late imho.

The lack of common sense is truly un believable out there