Leaving our little village the other morning I noticed a semi pulling flat B's turning into a field about a mile out. Looked pretty risky to head off across the snowy tundra in an outfit like that and then I saw there were two more ahead of him. Apparently they were hauling materials for the solar farm which is under construction there. On ground that was previously farmed.
This got me thinking what possible justification there could be to sterilize a portion of our earth to generate electricity. There have been solar panels for a variety of uses many years. Some to supply electricity in remote locations and some are on rooftops to supplement the power grid. But to capture the sunlight from acres of arable land and thus destroy its previous contribution to the ecosystem is a recent development around here.
Plants take in CO2 and turn it into food and oxygen. How can there by a higher land use than that? What non photosynthetic life forms might develop to use the soil moisture? I really can't imagine how the greenies can rationalize these blights to the landscape. I know cities can't function without electricity but the world can't function without photosynthesis.
This got me thinking what possible justification there could be to sterilize a portion of our earth to generate electricity. There have been solar panels for a variety of uses many years. Some to supply electricity in remote locations and some are on rooftops to supplement the power grid. But to capture the sunlight from acres of arable land and thus destroy its previous contribution to the ecosystem is a recent development around here.
Plants take in CO2 and turn it into food and oxygen. How can there by a higher land use than that? What non photosynthetic life forms might develop to use the soil moisture? I really can't imagine how the greenies can rationalize these blights to the landscape. I know cities can't function without electricity but the world can't function without photosynthesis.
Comment