Tha Final Solution for Agriculture?

[Guest]

there are no laws in the Libtard world
it is what they say it is
facts, details, laws of physics, etc. have no place in this fairytale

[jazz]

You arent going to need to grow more wheat or beef for the worlds growing populations, Klaus and Gates have it all covered.

And you all want to buy more land. Traditional ag is not part of their solution.


Crushed Bug "Additive" Is Now Included In Pizza, Pasta, & Cereals Across The EU
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...eals-across-eu

[fjlip]

Need another...



To the evil WEF bastards

[shtferbrains]

As part of the "Just Transition" there will be some job losses to help meet the Government's emissions reduction targets.
Agriculture is #1

"We expect that larger-scale transformations will take place in agriculture (about 292,000 workers; 1.5 per cent of Canada’s employment), energy (about 202,000 workers; one per cent of Canada's employment."

Lots of talk about the O&G workers but when does the Ag hit come out.

Have to work the propaganda to make sure the 3 cities that matter know how evil we are before revealing that one?

[AlbertaFarmer5]

I have a hard time believing that any technologies that would raise, create, or grow food what substantially less land area could possibly be less energy intensive than spreading it out over more area and using the Sun as the primary energy input. I have no doubt that there are many more efficiencies to be found within the current systems.
Is anyone aware of any examples of being able to grow more unless surface area that wouldn't require more external energy inputs per unit?

For example, a vertical farm where heat and water and nutrients all need to be imported into the system, compared to dry land broad acre crops where the sun and the water deliver themselves, along with a good proportion of the nutrients.

More vertical farms continue to go bankrupt, post losses, and lay off staff:

https://www.fastcompany.com/90824702/vertical-farming-failing-profitable-appharvest-aerofarms-bowery

Again I ask, who could have predicted that it would be less efficient to capture sun, water, nutrients, heat and bring them to indoor plants, than to use solar power directly.

From the article:
In a typical cold climate, you would need about five acres of solar panels to grow one acre of lettuce,” says Kale Harbick, a USDA researcher who studies controlled-environment agriculture. A hypothetical skysc****r filled with lettuce would require solar panels covering an area the size of Manhattan.
Yet this technology is being touted as a way to reduce our footprint?

So many idiotic schemes to separate fools from their money that will continue to collapse as interest rates normalize, and energy costs escalate.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

More vertical farms continue to go bankrupt, post losses, and lay off staff:

https://www.fastcompany.com/90824702/vertical-farming-failing-profitable-appharvest-aerofarms-bowery

Again I ask, who could have predicted that it would be less efficient to capture sun, water, nutrients, heat and bring them to indoor plants, than to use solar power directly.

From the article:
In a typical cold climate, you would need about five acres of solar panels to grow one acre of lettuce,” says Kale Harbick, a USDA researcher who studies controlled-environment agriculture. A hypothetical skysc****r filled with lettuce would require solar panels covering an area the size of Manhattan.
Yet this technology is being touted as a way to reduce our footprint?

So many idiotic schemes to separate fools from their money that will continue to collapse as interest rates normalize, and energy costs escalate.

I saw this headline today and I was shocked, shocked I tell you.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2367615-vertical-farm-cuts-energy-use-75-per-cent-by-using-sunlight/

Someone figured out that it is cheaper to grow plants with sunshine.
You mean you can't collect solar power send it to a dark building use it to power lights and heat and be more efficient than using the sunlight directly?
What will they figure out next?

[fjlip]

The earth is flat...

[AlbertaFarmer5]

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2372229-lab-grown-meat-could-be-25-times-worse-for-the-climate-than-beef/

Lab-grown meat could be 25 times worse for the climate than beef
Analysis finds the carbon footprint of cultivated meat is likely to be higher than beef if current production methods are scaled up because they are still highly energy-intensive
I recall having this discussion when grass farmer was still here. Where I insisted that the reason fake meat is so much more expensive is because it is so much more energy-intensive. Because like every product, the cost eventually comes down to how much energy is required to produce it throughout the entire supply chain.
But like virtually everything else in the green agenda, we won't let the fact that it's much worse for the environment stop us from calling it green.

[Guest]

Like the “wood pellets” scandal

[fjlip]

Like the “wood pellets” scandal

Cut down life saving trees, ship across Atlantic and BURN for stinking electrical generation in UK! Should be a CRIME

[furrowtickler]

Cut down life saving trees, ship across Atlantic and BURN for stinking electrical generation in UK! Should be a CRIME

No they use solar and wind powered ships now … it’s all good 🙄