Dear Alberta

[ajl]

[ATTACH]12578[/ATTACH]

Combine push polling like this with a some strategic cheating and this nightmare scenario could be reality in 2 weeks. This time there will be no restraint on the agenda of destruction.

[chuckChuck]

Alberta has changed and Smith is too far to the right and not very competent and struggles with telling the truth.

The lesson is don't let a talk show or reality TV host run anything.

Most Albertans learned this lesson from the experience with Donald.

[blackpowder]

All the unions are laughing.
Even on this highly learned site, all are bickering while a shell game is being played.
Danielle can be handled easily.
The union party not at all.

[chuckChuck]

Pierre Poilievere is courting the union vote too.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Pierre Poilievere is courting the union vote too.

And that is exactly why you find him so scary.

[chuckChuck]

Scary no. I just disagree with him and his party on a lot of issues.

[Guest]

Alberta has changed and Smith is too far to the right and not very competent and struggles with telling the truth.

The lesson is don't let a talk show or reality TV host run anything.

Most Albertans learned this lesson from the experience with Donald.

Holy shit chucky
I can see think of a lot better example than the Donald right here in Canada (drama teacher)

[beaverdam]

Holy shit chucky
I can see think of a lot better example than the Donald right here in Canada (drama teacher)

It's lost on chuckhead et al, that Canada is being run and reshaped, by a flunky, dope smokin', ski instructor, who would never, ever be elected, without his paternal name and the Media fawning.

[jazz]

Peter Lougheed was the smartest and most competent premiers to lead Alberta and if he was around today he sure as he** would NOT be voting for Smith'

The UCP with the strings being pulled by the christo-fascist group known as Take Alberta Back is NOT what Louheed stood for.

Mustard, sounds like you have some long communism issues to work through.

News flash. Lougheed is the one who stuck section S33 into the constitution, the very clause that Smith is referencing and strengthening. Lougheed would have had Alberta out of this fcked up nation by now.

Apparently (and some Ab residents can fact check me), Lougheed used the new clause way back in the 1980s to stop the Feds from taxing NG royalties or some sht.

And this is for chuck, who has the mental capcity of a flea. PP said he would unleash canadas resources. Leave it to the marxists to not want to deelop anything and increase our wealth. Better to take it from others. Sounds like Rolex Singh/Nutely are your kind of people.

By the way chuck, Bitcoin has out yielded the Canadian loon by several hundred percent from its inception. Wow facts.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

The lesson is don't let a talk show or reality TV host run anything.

Now here is something else we can agree upon.
The trouble with a talk show host, is that they have countless hours of conversation recorded for posterity every single day for years on end.
The opposition can easily find snippets in or out of context, which make the candidate look mad during an election campaign.
Do you think we are any different? If you decide to run for the NDP again, do you think no one will dredge up all of the things you have said on here? About wishing people's mothers to die alone in a dirty diaper for example? It may be completely out of context, as you are suggesting, but that won't come through in the attack ads.
In the era of social media, I'm not sure how we find any political candidates who are squeaky clean, do you have any suggestions?
Somehow we need to find candidates who have lived under a rock their entire lives. But then they will have zero experience managing anything, although that didn't stop our current prime minister.

[agstar77]

Combine push polling like this with a some strategic cheating and this nightmare scenario could be reality in 2 weeks. This time there will be no restraint on the agenda of destruction.

Ate you calling on Trump to do some election rigging?

[chuckChuck]

Now here is something else we can agree upon.
The trouble with a talk show host, is that they have countless hours of conversation recorded for posterity every single day for years on end.
The opposition can easily find snippets in or out of context, which make the candidate look mad during an election campaign.
Do you think we are any different? If you decide to run for the NDP again, do you think no one will dredge up all of the things you have said on here? About wishing people's mothers to die alone in a dirty diaper for example? It may be completely out of context, as you are suggesting, but that won't come through in the attack ads.
In the era of social media, I'm not sure how we find any political candidates who are squeaky clean, do you have any suggestions?
Somehow we need to find candidates who have lived under a rock their entire lives. But then they will have zero experience managing anything, although that didn't stop our current prime minister.

Smiths biggest failings have surfaced while in office.

She keeps putting her foot in her mouth, changes her story and then invents excuses and lies and maybe finally apologizes.

I have never run for any political party or position. Not even my local government.

And there you go again repeating a slanderous statement. You just can't help yourself.

What happened to your rules for a respectful debate?