Climate Clown Planet

[chuckChuck]

"No, it is not a real problem, not in our lifetimes." There you go A5 you finally admitted its not a problem and in fact the problem is the reverse.

And you need to think longer term than your lifetime A5.

Is there any scientific organization who says we should be concerned about declining CO2 levels in the next 100, 1000, 5000 years? NONE!

You keep coming up empty handed A5! Give up on this distraction and denialist absurdity.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

"No, it is not a real problem, not in our lifetimes." There you go A5 you finally admitted its not a problem and in fact the problem is the reverse.

And you need to think longer term than your lifetime A5.

Is there any scientific organization who says we should be concerned about declining CO2 levels in the next 100, 1000, 5000 years? NONE!

You keep coming up empty handed A5! Give up on this distraction and denialist absurdity.

That is quite a range. A few minutes ago you thought the CO2 would stick around for hundreds of thousands of years, now you think it might be somewhere between 100, and 5000 years. I thought this was all settled science? Considering the dire consequences of this topic, surely you can find the exact value? That looks more like a wild guess based on absolutely no evidence or scientific process. Almost makes one wonder how much of other supposed "climate science" is based on complete wild guesses doesn't it? Of course, you could just provide me with the actual figure and prove me wrong.

What is the residence time of CO2 in the atmosphere? If humans stopped releasing beneficial CO2 tomorrow, how soon will the additional life giving gas remain before nature sequesters all the CO2 above 280 ppm, and returns to the slow inexorable natural decline?

[chuckChuck]

Give up A5! You still haven't provide any scientific organization that thinks declining CO2 is a threat.

Your absurd ruminations of human caused climate change denier about declining CO2 levels are a distraction from the obvious much bigger issue.

A very slow decline in CO2 after we stop burning fossil fuels?

That's only if we don't reach a tipping point that triggers a massive release of stored greenhouse gases that set us on a course for irreversible warming.

And of course these are very long term changes well beyond your lifetime.

[cropgrower]

. pure scam

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Give up A5! You still haven't provide any scientific organization that thinks declining CO2 is a threat.

Your absurd ruminations of human caused climate change denier about declining CO2 levels are a distraction from the obvious much bigger issue.

A very slow decline in CO2 after we stop burning fossil fuels?

That's only if we don't reach a tipping point that triggers a massive release of stored greenhouse gases that set us on a course for irreversible warming.

And of course these are very long term changes well beyond your lifetime.

Try to stay on topic please.

You seem very preoccupied with the issue of CO2 levels declining after we stop releasing them from fossil fuels. You bring this topic up almost every time I pick on you. So, one could assume that you must be knowledgeable about this topic, otherwise, why would you step on the same garden rake over and over again, knowing it will smack you in the face if you don't know the answer to one very simple question.

Yet when I asked you a very elementary question, about a topic for which the science is allegedly settled, you made a wild guess, providing a range of 100 years, up to hundreds of thousands of years( which could be as much as a million years).

For someone with as much confidence in this topic as you portray with your bluster and bravado, and willingness to bring it up almost daily, I assumed you must know the exact answer, and that it must favor your position on the issue. Otherwise, any wise person (see what I did there, not going to assume your gender, just in case you get offended) would quietly avoid getting embroiled in a debate which they either don't know any relevant facts, or for which the actual facts run counter to your ideological position.

We have had this exact discussion countless times, and every time you come up empty handed. Well, not quite empty handed, you provide a litany of insults and childish names.

Maybe this time you can do your own research and try to narrow down the actual answer, since it is literally the root of the climate emergency narrative. If we stop releasing CO2 tomorrow, how long before the elevated levels return to their preindustrial levels? It makes a big difference if it is a week from next Tuesday, or a million years from now.

Maybe after you answer the residence time of CO2 in the atmosphere, then we can get back to the really fundamental question of the temperature sensitivity to a doubling of CO2. For which you have never been able to provide an accurate answer, but is the basis for the entire theory of global warming.

[jazz]

chuck are you concerned at all with the chernobyl like cloud that travelled over Ohio, or how about the largest methane leak in human history courtesy of the US govt.

Or is it cricket time.

[fjlip]

chuck are you concerned at all with the chernobyl like cloud that travelled over Ohio, or how about the largest methane leak in human history courtesy of the US govt.

Or is it cricket time.

Try a CRAZY guy and Alzheimer case with Nuclear buttons? Real screw up a planet!

Oh ya what planet?

[chuckChuck]

A5 has given up. Lots of words but no substance! Who the hell cares what he thinks cause nobody is listening. LOL

[AlbertaFarmer5]

A5 has given up. Lots of words but no substance! Who the hell cares what he thinks cause nobody is listening. LOL

That obstinate response would lead the reader to believe that you don't have a clue what the residence time of CO2 in the atmosphere is.
This detail is fundamental to your religion. You should make some effort to know this so you don't look like an idiot next time someone asks you. And I will keep asking you.

[agstar77]

Try a CRAZY guy and Alzheimer case with Nuclear buttons? Real screw up a planet!

Oh ya what planet?

You mean Putin?