Climate Clown Planet

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Give up A5! You still haven't provide any scientific organization that thinks declining CO2 is a threat.

Your absurd ruminations of human caused climate change denier about declining CO2 levels are a distraction from the obvious much bigger issue.

A very slow decline in CO2 after we stop burning fossil fuels?

That's only if we don't reach a tipping point that triggers a massive release of stored greenhouse gases that set us on a course for irreversible warming.

And of course these are very long term changes well beyond your lifetime.

Try to stay on topic please.

You seem very preoccupied with the issue of CO2 levels declining after we stop releasing them from fossil fuels. You bring this topic up almost every time I pick on you. So, one could assume that you must be knowledgeable about this topic, otherwise, why would you step on the same garden rake over and over again, knowing it will smack you in the face if you don't know the answer to one very simple question.

Yet when I asked you a very elementary question, about a topic for which the science is allegedly settled, you made a wild guess, providing a range of 100 years, up to hundreds of thousands of years( which could be as much as a million years).

For someone with as much confidence in this topic as you portray with your bluster and bravado, and willingness to bring it up almost daily, I assumed you must know the exact answer, and that it must favor your position on the issue. Otherwise, any wise person (see what I did there, not going to assume your gender, just in case you get offended) would quietly avoid getting embroiled in a debate which they either don't know any relevant facts, or for which the actual facts run counter to your ideological position.

We have had this exact discussion countless times, and every time you come up empty handed. Well, not quite empty handed, you provide a litany of insults and childish names.

Maybe this time you can do your own research and try to narrow down the actual answer, since it is literally the root of the climate emergency narrative. If we stop releasing CO2 tomorrow, how long before the elevated levels return to their preindustrial levels? It makes a big difference if it is a week from next Tuesday, or a million years from now.

Maybe after you answer the residence time of CO2 in the atmosphere, then we can get back to the really fundamental question of the temperature sensitivity to a doubling of CO2. For which you have never been able to provide an accurate answer, but is the basis for the entire theory of global warming.

[jazz]

chuck are you concerned at all with the chernobyl like cloud that travelled over Ohio, or how about the largest methane leak in human history courtesy of the US govt.

Or is it cricket time.

[fjlip]

chuck are you concerned at all with the chernobyl like cloud that travelled over Ohio, or how about the largest methane leak in human history courtesy of the US govt.

Or is it cricket time.

Try a CRAZY guy and Alzheimer case with Nuclear buttons? Real screw up a planet!

Oh ya what planet?

[chuckChuck]

A5 has given up. Lots of words but no substance! Who the hell cares what he thinks cause nobody is listening. LOL

[AlbertaFarmer5]

A5 has given up. Lots of words but no substance! Who the hell cares what he thinks cause nobody is listening. LOL

That obstinate response would lead the reader to believe that you don't have a clue what the residence time of CO2 in the atmosphere is.
This detail is fundamental to your religion. You should make some effort to know this so you don't look like an idiot next time someone asks you. And I will keep asking you.

[agstar77]

Try a CRAZY guy and Alzheimer case with Nuclear buttons? Real screw up a planet!

Oh ya what planet?

You mean Putin?

[jazz]

Man the only stupidity on par with EVs goes back to Y2K. Spent billions on nothing.

[furrowtickler]

A5 has given up. Lots of words but no substance! Who the hell cares what he thinks cause nobody is listening. LOL

Ummmm , that be you . LOL

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Ummmm , that be you . LOL

How can anyone be supporting an untenable theory with such religious fervor as Chuck does, and not even bother knowing the most simple fundamental underlying concepts.
This would be equivalent of spending your last dime to seed your entire farm down to some unknown magic seed that a traveling snake oil salesman sold you. Not tested for germination, no idea what the plant is that will grow, if anything. And believing in it so hard that in August when it still hasn't come out of the ground, to be still criticizing your neighbors for not following your brilliant example.

So what do you think is the reason why Chuck can't seem to answer this simple question?
Is it because he found the answer and it completely contradicts everything he believes in?
Is it because he can't find the answer because no one else knows either, indicating that the entire scam is based on junk science?
Or is it because he has his head in the sand obstinately refusing to risk learning anything that might challenge his myopic worldview?

[cropgrower]

Their is one more very likely possibility , he is here just to argue about everthing !

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Their is one more very likely possibility , he is here just to argue about everthing !

Absolutely. But wouldn't it be more fun and interesting and productive for all parties involved if he actually took the time to learn something about whatever he is arguing for? Instead of coming away looking like an idiot every time, and having to resort to childish insults as soon as the debate goes against him and he doesn't have any facts to counter with.

[chuckChuck]

"No, it is not a real problem, not in our lifetimes." A5's admission declining CO2 levels are not a real problem.

In about 200 years we went from 280 ppm to 420ppm of CO2 in the atmosphere, a relatively very rapid change with no sign that CO2 levels will stop rising anytime soon.

And even when they stop rising as the world transitions to lower carbon energy sources it will take many many years for CO2 levels to fall back to levels that may be of concern. It will be a very slow decline over 100s if not 1000s of years.

Only a dumbass would say its "not a real problem" but then go on about it as if it were a bigger problem than the current much bigger problem of rising CO2 levels and climate change.

No scientists or governments are saying this is a reason to keep burning fossil fuels. That's why A5 has given up and never produces any credible science to back up his pet fiction.