Climate Clown Planet

[jazz]

Man the only stupidity on par with EVs goes back to Y2K. Spent billions on nothing.

[furrowtickler]

A5 has given up. Lots of words but no substance! Who the hell cares what he thinks cause nobody is listening. LOL

Ummmm , that be you . LOL

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Ummmm , that be you . LOL

How can anyone be supporting an untenable theory with such religious fervor as Chuck does, and not even bother knowing the most simple fundamental underlying concepts.
This would be equivalent of spending your last dime to seed your entire farm down to some unknown magic seed that a traveling snake oil salesman sold you. Not tested for germination, no idea what the plant is that will grow, if anything. And believing in it so hard that in August when it still hasn't come out of the ground, to be still criticizing your neighbors for not following your brilliant example.

So what do you think is the reason why Chuck can't seem to answer this simple question?
Is it because he found the answer and it completely contradicts everything he believes in?
Is it because he can't find the answer because no one else knows either, indicating that the entire scam is based on junk science?
Or is it because he has his head in the sand obstinately refusing to risk learning anything that might challenge his myopic worldview?

[cropgrower]

Their is one more very likely possibility , he is here just to argue about everthing !

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Their is one more very likely possibility , he is here just to argue about everthing !

Absolutely. But wouldn't it be more fun and interesting and productive for all parties involved if he actually took the time to learn something about whatever he is arguing for? Instead of coming away looking like an idiot every time, and having to resort to childish insults as soon as the debate goes against him and he doesn't have any facts to counter with.

[chuckChuck]

"No, it is not a real problem, not in our lifetimes." A5's admission declining CO2 levels are not a real problem.

In about 200 years we went from 280 ppm to 420ppm of CO2 in the atmosphere, a relatively very rapid change with no sign that CO2 levels will stop rising anytime soon.

And even when they stop rising as the world transitions to lower carbon energy sources it will take many many years for CO2 levels to fall back to levels that may be of concern. It will be a very slow decline over 100s if not 1000s of years.

Only a dumbass would say its "not a real problem" but then go on about it as if it were a bigger problem than the current much bigger problem of rising CO2 levels and climate change.

No scientists or governments are saying this is a reason to keep burning fossil fuels. That's why A5 has given up and never produces any credible science to back up his pet fiction.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

And even when they stop rising as the world transitions to lower carbon energy sources it will take many many years for CO2 levels to fall back to levels that may be of concern. It will be a very slow decline over 100s if not 1000s of years.

So you still have no idea, might be hundreds of years, might be 1000's of years, yesterday you thought it might be millions of years. Are you sure it isn't measured in decades, years, months, or hours?
Surely one of your go to websites where you get all the sciency sounding cut and pastes has the exact answer. After all, these sites are designed for for social media warriors such as yourself for refuting the "climate deniers".

So, you have essentially dedicated your life to this cause, wasting countless hours trying to convince social media to take you and your cause seriously, but you don't even take it seriously enough to verify the basic premise upon which it is built?

[cropgrower]

must be some job digging tru the internet trying to find something to support your deranged way of thinking CC !

[chuckChuck]

A5 Keep digging yourself a deeper hole while the CO2 levels keep steadily rising.

You probably think that as soon as we stop burning fossil fuels we will be back into an ice age? LOL

[chuckChuck]

must be some job digging tru the internet trying to find something to support your deranged way of thinking CC !

Huh? Its very easy to find NOAA, NASA, and numerous other credible scientific institutions in multiple with climate researchers providing large amounts of evidence.

And they are all deranged too? LOL Lame Really Lame cropgrower

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Keep digging yourself a deeper hole while the CO2 levels keep steadily rising.

You probably think that as soon as we stop burning fossil fuels we will be back into an ice age? LOL

That is what I am trying to learn from you, that's why I keep asking you, the self proclaimed foremost expert on CO2.

How about, until proven otherwise, we will assume your above statement is true. "as soon as we stop burning fossil fuels we will be back into an ice age"

Doesn't sound like an emergency does it?

Now can you prove that statement wrong?

[chuckChuck]

Ask a climate scientists or google it. That can't be so hard! Or do you want me to do your homework again? LOL

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Huh? Its very easy to find NOAA, NASA, and numerous other credible scientific institutions in multiple with climate researchers providing large amounts of evidence.

This is excellent news, you should have no trouble finding the answer to my question from one of these numerous credible scientific institutions. Prove me wrong once and for all.

But you claim they have evidence? How can they provide evidence of of something which hasn't occurred yet? We haven't stopped emitting CO2 yet, so how can they have large amounts of evidence about what comes next? Do you understand how evidence works?

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Ask a climate scientists or google it. That can't be so hard! Or do you want me to do your homework again? LOL

Here is the issue. You have been frantically googling this for the past few days, and either you can't find any concrete answers, or the answers you found don't support your alarmist viewpoint. Otherwise, you would have already posted the answer instead of deflecting, deflecting deflecting.

[chuckChuck]

Since you are so slow and lazy I will do your homework again! Give up on the idea we are going to run out of enough CO2. Its "not a real problem" as you admitted. Now you can get back to feeding your cows.

https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/projects/climate-change-evidence-causes/question-20/

20. If emissions of greenhouse gases were stopped, would the climate return to the conditions of 200 years ago?

No. Even if emissions of greenhouse gases were to suddenly stop, Earth’s surface temperature would require thousands of years to cool and return to the level in the pre-industrial era.

If emissions of CO2 stopped altogether, it would take many thousands of years for atmospheric CO2 to return to “pre-industrial” levels due to its very slow transfer to the deep ocean and ultimate burial in ocean sediments. Surface temperatures would stay elevated for at least a thousand years, implying a long-term commitment to a warmer planet due to past and current emissions. Sea level would likely continue to rise for many centuries even after temperature stopped increasing [Figure 9]. Significant cooling would be required to reverse melting of glaciers and the Greenland ice sheet, which formed during past cold climates. The current CO2-induced warming of Earth is therefore essentially irreversible on human timescales. The amount and rate of further warming will depend almost entirely on how much more CO2 humankind emits.