• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Saskatchewan company greenlights Canada's first large-scale geothermal power plant

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Saskatchewan company greenlights Canada's first large-scale geothermal power plant

    Saskatchewan company greenlights Canada's first large-scale geothermal power plant

    A 25-megawatt facility should produce enough power for 25,000 households
    Author of the article:
    Meghan Potkins
    Published Feb 06, 2023 • 3 minute read

    Saskatchewan’s Deep Earth Energy Production Corp. said it will begin construction this year on Canada’s first commercial-scale facility for producing electricity from geothermal heat, highlighting how Canada’s expertise in oil and gas can be adapted to produce greener energy.

    The Saskatoon-based company uses drilling techniques that are more commonly associated with oil extraction than anything currently found in the world of geothermal energy.

    The privately held Deep Earth announced Feb. 6 that procurement and engineering work has already begun on the first phase of a 25-megawatt power facility in southeast Saskatchewan, close to the U.S. border. The project will be supported by a previously announced five-megawatt power purchase agreement with SaskPower — the first geothermal power contract in Canada.

    “We’re using a highly skilled team and workforce from the oil and gas sector and redeploying those skills and that knowhow for the first time ever on a renewable energy project,” said chief executive Kirsten Marcia. “We’re not taking the stance as a clean energy company that it’s us against them.”

    Construction and drilling on the first five-megawatt phase will begin in the fourth quarter of this year, with first power production expected by the summer of 2024. The next 20-megawatt segment is not yet fully financed, Marcia said, but once complete, the project will be capable of powering 25,000 households.

    Geothermal ‘always on 24/7’

    The announcement represents a key turning point for Canada’s nascent geothermal power industry, which remains underdeveloped despite the country’s abundant potential. Geothermal projects are typically more expensive to build than wind or solar, but deliver more reliable, around-the-clock energy.

    “As a consequence, we can attract better contracts than wind or solar,” Marcia said. “Because if you’re a utility and you’re buying wind, and the wind isn’t blowing, you need something else to power your grid. With geothermal, it is always on 24/7. Once we’re up and running, it’s always producing power.”

    Deep Earth’s project will use oilfield horizontal drilling techniques to access geothermal power, with wells drilled to a depth of about 3.5 kilometres and horizontally for an additional three kilometres. Similar well designs are routinely used in oil and gas, but application of these techniques to renewables is new, the company said.

    Marcia, who founded the company, trained as a geologist and worked for years in the oil and gas and mining sectors before turning her attention to renewable energy. With Saskatchewan’s geothermal potential largely hidden underground, she said the company has relied on decades of publicly available exploratory drilling data from the oil and gas industry to identify potential hotspots.
    `Cracked the code’

    Reaching a final investment decision wasn’t easy, however, as the company dealt with numerous engineering challenges in designing a facility that wouldn’t be at risk of consuming all of the power that it was generating, Marcia said.

    During testing, the company also had to find a way to mitigate against the corrosive tendencies of the water it drew from underground reservoirs to the surface for electricity generation, requiring Deep Earth to use protective coatings in well designs that increased project costs.

    But, after 12 years of effort, Marcia said the company is “100 per cent comfortable” in proceeding with construction.

    “We believe we’ve cracked the code for these lower temperature geothermal resources around the world,” Marcia said. “Saskatchewan is not unique … these sedimentary basins are found all over the world with similar geothermal resources. What can get very exciting is if we were able to deploy this technology and our expertise (to) really have a potentially globally transformative impact on the geothermal energy industry.”

    #2
    So "renewable" geothermal electricity?

    This will make it difficult for all the naysayers to tell us renewables are not going to play a bigger role in decarbonizing our electricity supply.

    Comment


      #3
      Sounds like a sure way to cool the core of the planet and ultimately cause it's demise.

      Comment


        #4
        If they used that equipment and crew to drill a series of 7000 meter natural gas wells how many houses could they service?

        With no government money.

        Comment


          #5
          At least you dropped the solar, wind idea.

          Comment


            #6
            “the company dealt with numerous engineering challenges in designing a facility that wouldn’t be at risk of consuming all of the power that it was generating”

            So after 12 years of thinking about it, what changed? How much will it net produce now for export?

            How much government $$ is going into this? Is that the only way it can be feasible?

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by blackpowder View Post
              At least you dropped the solar, wind idea.
              I have no idea why he is trying to put the sign of equality between the unreliables of wind and solar, and actual dispatchable reliable geothermal. Lumping them all in with the misnomer of renewable.
              He must think this is somehow a controversial topic, which it is not.
              Geothermal does not require 100% backup, it does not require storage technology which does not exist, it does not require all other producers and consumers to subsidize the technology which cannot stand on its own.
              It's already tried and proven in many places in the world. Iceland gets 70% of its electricity from geothermal, the remainder from hydroelectric.
              The problem the Earth muffins such as Chuck have now, is that they have been vilifying everything to do with the fossil fuel industry for so long, but geothermal requires all of the technology and equipment and expertise that the fossil fuel industry has been perfecting. In fact it goes one step further, existing Wells can be repurposed for geothermal. There goes Chuck's argument about orphaned and abandoned wells. It uses materials which are already in abundance, and not monopolized by china. It uses the skilled labor force which we already possess. And most importantly, in the geology where it works, it doesn't require massive government mandates and subsidies, so much for socialism through the back door.
              And if it can be done economically in our geology, then it doesn't matter if there's a price on co2 or not, doesn't matter that there is no climate emergency, it won't matter if fossil fuels turn out to be infinite, it will still win. The same cannot be said for any of the hair brained unreliable schemes currently being deployed. Such as trucks imaginary solar panels.
              I don't know anyone who has anything against renewable energy, it is expensive unreliable energy which common sense people are opposed to.

              Edit to
              Before anyone tears me apart because the geology of prairies versus Iceland or Hawaii are completely different. The breathtaking progress within the drilling and directional drilling and fracking in this region has opened up possibilities and efficiencies which couldn't have been dreamed of 20 years ago.

              I remain cautiously optimistic that the economics will eventually work.

              And I become more pessimistic by the day that dispatchable solar and wind could ever be economic.
              Last edited by AlbertaFarmer5; Feb 7, 2023, 12:07.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by blackpowder View Post
                At least you dropped the solar, wind idea.
                Chuck just post the damn article without any silly little snide comments, man. You make it so hard to be on your side sometimes fella.
                Our house is on geothermal and its fantastic. Geothermal energy is an absolute no brainer. So is solar. Im putting in a huge array this summer! So are Evs. Maybe not for everyone and maybe not at CURRENT BATTERY CAPABILITIEs...BUT... its coming.

                Its important for me to say that the imperial oil tanks at Redwater whwre they drilled after the Leduc #1 wells ... were situated on the land that we own and have farmed and live on. Oil and gas runs deeeeeeeep in my family and even I understand the changing tide and the love of oil and gas that we have in Canada.
                THAT being said.
                How many miles does a ford f150 lightning need to do for you ..or I to buy one? 800? 1200? Its coming... it will get to the point where an electric truck makes sense.
                Another important thing to remember is that you have to start somewhere. Just like the single use plastic ban. We can buy lettuce thats in plastic at the grocery store...but cant leave the store with that lettuce in a plastic bag ( it seems absurd but you have..to start..somewhere )

                The grid could NOT handle the electrification of all of canadas vehicles. BUT when was the last time the grid was heavily upgraded? The 50s? 70s?
                This EV push is a start to something bigger...upgrading the grid which is what needs to be done nationwide anyways!

                And as for the mining of the metals... and the total carbon footprint of an EV.. i saw a study done ( have to do some searching to post it here) that showed all the numbers for the total footprint of an ICE vs an EV and after 1.3 yrs the EV was equivalent footprint...after that its footprint stopped and the ICE kept on growing. The beauty of an EV is that it doesnt have to rely on ONE source of power.
                Think about that for a second.

                An ICE requires oil and fuel of some sort. An electric vehicle doesnt care where the electricity that powers it comes from ( and thats the main difference here) in that it could be solar, wind, coal burn, wood burn ..hydro... renewable OR non renewable source of electricity. You can NOT power an ICE on renewable energy.

                I understand the pushback on the EV idea ..but seriously... why the pushback? Where is the threat to our way of life as farmers if electric vehicles were to take over the vast majority of vehicles on the road? Last time i checked i grow canola/ wheat...not diesel..

                Even if climate warming is a scam and money transfer... doesnt an electric vehicle just make sense in all of our brains?

                Comment


                  #9
                  Well at least you bring up valid points in a reasonable fashion.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by blackpowder View Post
                    Well at least you bring up valid points in a reasonable fashion.
                    Yes, it is a pleasure to read an opposing viewpoint which is presented rationally, politely, and doesn't involve the words flat earth and LOL.

                    Please post more often.

                    Discussions and debates are far more interesting when both sides are willing to actually debate.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Quote of the year or decade even.....

                      Chuck just post the damn article without any silly little snide comments, man. You make it so hard to be on your side sometimes fella.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        It would be interesting to see if the University of Regina is still using the one installed in the early seventies.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          I have posted many articles without any comments and get lots of "opinions" and personal criticism regardless. Big deal. It doesn't bother me one bit coming from the usual suspects.

                          And pointing out that this project is a renewable source of electricity that is hard to to dismiss or criticize is fair game in the ongoing discussion.

                          The point is deep geothermal using hot water is a new option in western Canada it has a lot of potential and some draw backs just like solar, wind, hydro and several other low carbon options have drawbacks.

                          We are already using all the sources above successfully.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post

                            The point is deep geothermal using hot water is a new option in western Canada it has a lot of potential and some draw backs just like solar, wind, hydro and several other low carbon options have drawbacks.
                            No. It doesn't have any of the drawbacks of wind or solar. It is reliable, predictable, dispatchable, scalable, and doesn't rely entirely on a supply chain completely dependent on a hostile China.

                            And I don't know why you continue to list hydro as an option, when your own NFU organization is radically opposed to hydro. Why will you never address this hypocrisy?

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Geo thermal is renewable and has big advantages over solar and wind.

                              But solar and wind are also great options in many parts of the world and have their advantages.

                              One of the advantages of solar is it can be installed by homeowners and rural residents to generate some of their own electricity.

                              And wind and solar components are being manufactured in several countries of the world.

                              And I consider hydro a great source of renewable electricity with some downi sdes but Canada already gets 60% of its electricity from hydro.
                              Last edited by chuckChuck; Feb 8, 2023, 09:40.

                              Comment

                              • Reply to this Thread
                              • Return to Topic List
                              Working...