• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

For all you EV Promoters

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #91
    Originally posted by fjlip View Post
    Every test ever done since 1975, calls for MORE than we apply/can afford.

    Only one year, 1991 called for ZERO added N and it was correct. 60 bu wheat happened.

    #1 CWRS worth less than $2
    It is your team's job to provide information. It is yours to interpret and make the money.

    Comment


      #92
      Originally posted by WiltonRanch View Post
      I have high calcium content 6” and down. Ph 8.2 down there. Top 6” 6.5 to 6.9. Using mesc on virtually every acre at maybe 5-9 lbs of sulphur depending if it a cereal or canola. Barley yields sucked here until I inadvertently did a side by side trial of urea/11-52 and urea/mesc. Same nitrogen and phosphorus levels but 20 bushels better with mesc blend. Tried again in 21’ on another field in the drought but barley was still in the 80’s. Last year didn’t use mesc and barley sucked. My bins are full of urea/mesc. Is it the safer nature of mesc vs 11-52 or is it the sulphur? I run stealth pr double shoot so separation is good and a 20# rate of actual p is really stuff all. So what’s going on? Im a cowboy hill farmer. My remedy is usually seed it to grass and alfalfa but can’t do that on every acre.
      You mean MESZ from Mosaic?
      Sorry, I leave the chemistry and theory to someone else. I just have to make decisions lol.
      I think we are pushing rather old information and the ratios of the 4 macros more important. So wag possibly is the S. And the P right with N in same granule makes it easier to find. That could facilitate more P usage. Sounds good.
      ??
      Last edited by blackpowder; Mar 21, 2023, 13:34.

      Comment


        #93
        Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
        I soil test about 1/2 my fields every year. How about you?
        We do every acre every year except the alfalfa
        And then our agrologist tells us what to put

        Comment


          #94
          Sask budget.
          1 billion surplus.
          1st pic they show is a oil pump.
          Not a EV charger.
          So when oil is not used where is the $$$ going to come from?

          Comment


            #95
            I really don’t need to say much, headline says it all.

            Comment


              #96
              "Germany's Transport Ministry sees no need to rush combustion engine phase-out deal with EU

              Saying Germany needs a backup before agreeing to EU plans."


              A lot of the enthusiasm has gone out of the believers .
              Reality check?

              G7 meeting coming up.
              Will be a tough one to spin.

              Comment


                #97
                5% of Ford dealers have backed out of selling a minimum of 25 EV vehicles per yr..

                Comment


                  #98
                  Why does the govt to solicit votes, always turn to supply push policies that never work? Artificial demand is still artificial.

                  Comment


                    #99
                    History repeats itself again…

                    Now a bail out????

                    Common sense sadly…. Not so common….

                    Cheers

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Partners View Post
                      Sask budget.
                      1 billion surplus.
                      1st pic they show is a oil pump.
                      Not a EV charger.
                      So when oil is not used where is the $$$ going to come from?
                      So are you suggesting we should continue to use very inefficient gasoline ICE engines that only put 20% of the total fossil energy in to moving a vehicle forward, when EVs can transfer 80-90% of their energy for the same purpose?

                      Oil will have uses going forward, but burning it and wasting 80% in ICEs in a carbon emission constrained world is not a good use of it and can never be justified, just because we need government tax revenue from the oil industry.

                      Once we get through the transition to lower costs EVs, most consumers would happily put the massive efficiency gains of EVs in their own pocket, than give it to the oil companies who don't even cover all their cleanup costs and environmental damage during periods of high profitability.
                      Last edited by chuckChuck; Mar 24, 2023, 08:14.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...