• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

wokeness

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • furrowtickler
    replied
    There has been billions and billions paid out , when is enough, enough ??

    Leave a comment:


  • fjlip
    replied
    Been said before, colonizers brought First Nations out of the Stone Age. No wheel, no horse, no written language. Guaranteed not a single one would go back to pre European civilization.

    We all benefited, agree , it’s a wash. Nobody owes anyone.

    Leave a comment:


  • AlbertaFarmer5
    replied
    Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
    And of course all settler families, their descendants, the larger Canadian community, and more recent immigrants all have benefited from colonization. Some more than others.
    Would you say that first Nations themselves have derived any benefits from colonization, or is this strictly a one-way Street?
    Do healthcare and social programs and technology and the virtual elimination of famine the end of tribal warfare, guns, horses, automobiles, heated homes, education, law enforcement, Justice system, human rights, etc belong in the benefits column or the victims of colonization column?

    One way to look at this is if the colonizers handed over the keys tomorrow and walked away, how many of these technologies and institutions would the first Nations immediately give up to return to the good old days?

    Another thought, since the nfu which you are a member of is a strong advocate for the land back movement, assume we go through with that and return all the land to the tribes to whom it rightfully belonged to before the white man took it away, do you think there would be any disagreement amongst the various tribes as to who had the hereditary rights to what portion of canada? Or there were never any historical disputes over territory, their own intertribal legal system spelled out exactly what territory belonged to who? There have never been any wars over territory, the tribal distribution the day the white man came was set in stone since the beginning of time? The land back process would not result in any legal disagreements or civil war amongst or within tribes? Really think about the implications of that question.

    Leave a comment:


  • chuckChuck
    replied
    I am not personally blaming anyone for what happened in the past unless they were one of the abusers or furthering racists views.

    Governments and churches are the ones that should take responsibility for harm done and the systemic problems, which is work in progress.

    And of course all settler families, their descendants, the larger Canadian community, and more recent immigrants all have benefited from colonization. Some more than others.

    But that doesn't mean we should ignore the results of past policies and harms done. Or deny the abuse or cultural genocide. Or deny the present day problems including lingering racism and intolerance.

    Leave a comment:


  • jazz
    replied
    Originally posted by cropgrower View Post
    in fact blaming people for something they did not do like you are doing CC makes folk more resentfull to the whole cause , so use your brain before you do more harm
    Maybe chuck can tell us if our recent batch of immigrants bear any blame in this as well, or is it only settlers.

    By my calculation, liberal lefty houses are also built on claimed native land.

    So when will the apologies from those groups start flowing. I dont see chinese and indian immigrants wearing too many orange shirts unless they are NDP supporters.

    Leave a comment:


  • cropgrower
    replied
    in fact blaming people for something they did not do like you are doing CC makes folk more resentfull to the whole cause , so use your brain before you do more harm

    Leave a comment:


  • AlbertaFarmer5
    replied
    Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
    If you want a solution, you can start by acknowledging the harm that was done and admit that the legacy of the harm is still with us today in broken dysfunctional communities.

    Harper apologized for the residential schools even though his government had nothing to do with them.

    Many Conservatives want to blame first nations for all their problems, as if previous governments had nothing to do with what happened.

    The residential school legacy continues and so does the very negative and unsympathetic attitude towards first nations people amongst some people.

    Instead of blaming the victims of cultural genocide who lost their land and were put on uneconomic reserves with few resources so that settlers could take their land. Try to imagine how you would feel if the same happened to you.

    Its well past time for reconciliation and working together to improves the lives of first nations. We will all be better off the sooner it happens.
    And how effective has that victimhood strategy been? By what measures have their lives improved with all of the apologies and acknowledgments, canceling politicians, toppling statues, renaming landmarks etc? Or is this not a results based solution?
    Last edited by AlbertaFarmer5; Jul 12, 2023, 07:49.

    Leave a comment:


  • cropgrower
    replied
    dont think their is anybody here that believes their was no harm done , but we are not one single bit to blame , what is the answer now ? no point ranting about what happened years ago nobody can go back and change that , what NOW ?

    Leave a comment:


  • chuckChuck
    replied
    If you want a solution, you can start by acknowledging the harm that was done and admit that the legacy of the harm is still with us today in broken dysfunctional communities.

    Harper apologized for the residential schools even though his government had nothing to do with them.

    Many Conservatives want to blame first nations for all their problems, as if previous governments had nothing to do with what happened.

    The residential school legacy continues and so does the very negative and unsympathetic attitude towards first nations people amongst some people.

    Instead of blaming the victims of cultural genocide who lost their land and were put on uneconomic reserves with few resources so that settlers could take their land. Try to imagine how you would feel if the same happened to you.

    Its well past time for reconciliation and working together to improves the lives of first nations. We will all be better off the sooner it happens.

    Leave a comment:


  • TSIPP
    replied
    Originally posted by sumdumguy View Post
    Thinking about gravesites, there are many tiny gravesites without markers in our cemeteries. Does that mean that those little people were murdered? No, it means, the markers were wooden and deteriorated in a hundred or more years. There were prairie fires that destroyed a lot of cemeteries too. Communication was almost non- existent, so how do you notify natives dispersed in bush and on trap lines that their child was ill and needed them? Or how would one get rid of the unclaimed body humanely? Think
    Lots of graves on home quarters and what once was a home quarters, lots of the unmarked graves near the residential schools are farmers and people of European decent because the schools usually had a church near by.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by cropgrower View Post
    not one bit wrong , the 5,315 that abused kids shud stand trial , not the whole population of canada , what about all the imigrants to Canada are they also part of the WE group ?
    Sardine can lid for the men ,simple operation, never to late
    Same with that *** prick that just got sent to minimum security

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by WiltonRanch View Post
    Gosh my info was crap then. Even so chuckles is trying to make a mountain out of a molehill and in the process has contradicted himself for decades. Pompous twat.
    His adopted dad switched sides after the ninth inning

    Leave a comment:


  • WiltonRanch
    replied
    Originally posted by wiseguy
    Pierre's parents were Donald and Marlene Poilievre !
    Gosh my info was crap then. Even so chuckles is trying to make a mountain out of a molehill and in the process has contradicted himself for decades. Pompous twat.

    Leave a comment:


  • sumdumguy
    replied
    Originally posted by jazz View Post
    Man is chuck playing with half a deck these days. The govt was the abuser, forcing Christian schools to take on their unresolved problem 100 yrs ago. Just because I exist in an era of govt incompetence, doesnt make me part of it. Chuck thinks settlers living on rocks and cactus with a gr 4 education should have stopped it back in the day. Thats pure deflection. He wants to draw them into the blame so if there are reparations it comes from that group.

    The Indian Act has been brought up in many govts. Guess who doesnt want to give it up... the natives.

    And the govt is still the abuser. They coerce the natives every election, drawing them into stupider socialist schemes each time and surprise, they are poorer every time.

    All the natives have to so is step outside the reserves, look at what all the wealth creators are doing around them, and partner up in good faith. But they have made an enemy out of everyone that would help them, so now its just the govt and them. Good luck with that.

    When are they going to dig up those alleged grave sites.
    Thinking about gravesites, there are many tiny gravesites without markers in our cemeteries. Does that mean that those little people were murdered? No, it means, the markers were wooden and deteriorated in a hundred or more years. There were prairie fires that destroyed a lot of cemeteries too. Communication was almost non- existent, so how do you notify natives dispersed in bush and on trap lines that their child was ill and needed them? Or how would one get rid of the unclaimed body humanely? Think

    Leave a comment:


  • WiltonRanch
    replied
    Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
    Pierre Poilievre 'does not agree' with 'straight pride' message in photo from Stampede

    https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/pierre-poilievre-does-not-agree-with-straight-pride-message-in-photo-at-stampede

    Oh shoot Pierre has gone woke! At the Calgary Stampede! The Greatest Outdoor Cowboy show on the planet no less.

    This should get the bigots and LGBQT haters all riled up.

    Who are they going to vote for now considering that Crypto and Melisssa Lantsman aren't going to turn on the LGBQT community like many of the so con sheep were hoping.

    I see Weber is back with his uncontrollable anger, foul language and bluster making stupid accusations and analogies! LOL
    Larry called out your hypocrisy which you seem to be good at doing with everyone else but when you get the figurative jersey pulled over your head you lay down on the ice and play possum.

    Polivere was raised by a same sex couple. No big deal to the majority of people. It’s a non issue except for the intolerant few and the radicals in the lgbtq community. Ffs I’m about tired of this argument like abortion or birth control. It’s personal body autonomy like a persons right to not have to sell their wheat to the cwb. Funny the champions of personal body autonomy supported the government monopoly on wheat marketing. What’s that about?

    Leave a comment:

  • Reply to this Thread
  • Return to Topic List
Working...