wokeness

[chuckChuck]

So leaving governments out of it which credible scientific organizations are saying that human caused climate change is not occurring nor is it a threat?

Still no answer to this question? LOL

Give up because you climate change denier opinions are not proof of anything except your delusions.

Even crypto Polly says human caused climate change is real!

[cropgrower]

once and for All CC explain what is a Credible Scientific Organization ? explain how one can be trusted 100%

[chuckChuck]

So name any scientific organization that thinks human caused climate change is not real.

If crypto polly says its real it has to be real! Right! LOL

[cropgrower]

looks like you cant do what i asked ? PP plays along to get some votes from the crazy climate nutters , why doees he keep saying axe the carbon Tax ? the LOL proves even you think its a joke

[chuckChuck]

Still no scientific organization? Give up Crap!

[cropgrower]

you are far too brainwashed to know that big tec keeps any website that dont fit the agenda pushed away down the list when a search is done , exactly same as happened with plandemic

[chuckChuck]

Lame try crop.

But the real reason is you can't find any scientific organizations that say human caused climate change isn't happening is because not one scientific organization has the research, evidence and data to support such a claim.

[shtferbrains]

Again,some Scientific organizations are not as credible as they once were.

[cropgrower]

i guess looking back at all the past climate predictions that have happened just as they said we shud not even question what they are saying now ! likely just me but when somebody lies to me i dont trust them very much from their on

[cropgrower]

[chuckChuck]

Crop your climate change denier video is BS! By the way Leo Dicaprio is not a climate scientist! Nor are you! LOL

From NASA:

https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2943/study-confirms-climate-models-are-getting-future-warming-projections-right/

Study Confirms Climate Models are Getting Future Warming Projections Right

In a study accepted for publication in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, a research team led by Zeke Hausfather of the University of California, Berkeley, conducted a systematic evaluation of the performance of past climate models. The team compared 17 increasingly sophisticated model projections of global average temperature developed between 1970 and 2007, including some originally developed by NASA, with actual changes in global temperature observed through the end of 2017. The observational temperature data came from multiple sources, including NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies Surface Temperature Analysis (GISTEMP) time series, an estimate of global surface temperature change.

The results: 10 of the model projections closely matched observations. Moreover, after accounting for differences between modeled and actual changes in atmospheric carbon dioxide and other factors that drive climate, the number increased to 14. The authors found no evidence that the climate models evaluated either systematically overestimated or underestimated warming over the period of their projections.

[Guest]

By the way Leo Decaprios not a climate scientist! LOL

And yet , the sheep listen to him ?

[chuckChuck]

By the way Leo Decaprios not a climate scientist! LOL

And yet , the sheep listen to him ?

But you listen to the flat earthers who can't do science? LOL

[cropgrower]

We are after over 50 years of climate prediction lies that were garbage ,everything shud have been over allready , overheated on in another ice age could have been either one 🤣🤣explain for us why we shud believe the lies they are telling us now

[chuckChuck]

Thats the best you got their crap? LOL

Not one shred of real evidence to back up your uninformed opinion? Give up!