wokeness

[chuckChuck]

Rum must have missed this article I posted on another thread.

Study Confirms Climate Models are Getting Future Warming Projections Right

By Alan Buis,
NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory

https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2943/study-confirms-climate-models-are-getting-future-warming-projections-right/

In a study accepted for publication in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, a research team led by Zeke Hausfather of the University of California, Berkeley, conducted a systematic evaluation of the performance of past climate models. The team compared 17 increasingly sophisticated model projections of global average temperature developed between 1970 and 2007, including some originally developed by NASA, with actual changes in global temperature observed through the end of 2017. The observational temperature data came from multiple sources, including NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies Surface Temperature Analysis (GISTEMP) time series, an estimate of global surface temperature change.

The results: 10 of the model projections closely matched observations. Moreover, after accounting for differences between modeled and actual changes in atmospheric carbon dioxide and other factors that drive climate, the number increased to 14. The authors found no evidence that the climate models evaluated either systematically overestimated or underestimated warming over the period of their projections.

[blackpowder]

I know a fellow who grew up in Nigeria. He remembers it was common to eat only once a day. He calls us spoiled. In China ,in the countryside, I was told that not long ago a common greeting was "You eat today"?
Now, I don't have the fixes for that, but I do believe we are through affluence unaware of others' situations.
If the foremost daily thought on 2/3 of the world's mind is food, what do they see anthropogenic climate theories as?

[blackpowder]

Who's right, who's wrong can't be proven today. But I know a crusade when I hear one.

[chuckChuck]

There are 1000s of climate scientists working on climate change. And there are no scientific organizations that say human caused climate change is not happening.

[jazz]

chuck is pure comedy gold now. His scientists told us winters would be gone and the Statue of Liberty underwater.

Wow incredibly accurate.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Rum must have missed this article I posted on another thread.

Study Confirms Climate Models are Getting Future Warming Projections Right

By Alan Buis,
NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory

https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2943/study-confirms-climate-models-are-getting-future-warming-projections-right/

In a study accepted for publication in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, a research team led by Zeke Hausfather of the University of California, Berkeley, conducted a systematic evaluation of the performance of past climate models. The team compared 17 increasingly sophisticated model projections of global average temperature developed between 1970 and 2007, including some originally developed by NASA, with actual changes in global temperature observed through the end of 2017. The observational temperature data came from multiple sources, including NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies Surface Temperature Analysis (GISTEMP) time series, an estimate of global surface temperature change.

The results: 10 of the model projections closely matched observations. Moreover, after accounting for differences between modeled and actual changes in atmospheric carbon dioxide and other factors that drive climate, the number increased to 14. The authors found no evidence that the climate models evaluated either systematically overestimated or underestimated warming over the period of their projections.

And Chuck used bold in his repetitive cut and paste, rumrocks did not use bold, so obviously that makes Chuck's cut and paste more true than Rumrocks. Bold is the equivalent of repeating it louder. Catherine McKenna would be proud

[blackpowder]

There are 1000s of climate scientists working on climate change. And there are no scientific organizations that say human caused climate change is not happening.

People think in terms of seasons. The planet in epochs. Oceans and mountains come and go.
Maybe I've read too much history. It's not the message but it's presentation that sounds too familiar.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Rum must have missed this article I posted on another thread.

Study Confirms Climate Models are Getting Future Warming Projections Right

By Alan Buis,
NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory

https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2943/study-confirms-climate-models-are-getting-future-warming-projections-right/

In a study accepted for publication in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, a research team led by Zeke Hausfather of the University of California, Berkeley, conducted a systematic evaluation of the performance of past climate models. The team compared 17 increasingly sophisticated model projections of global average temperature developed between 1970 and 2007, including some originally developed by NASA, with actual changes in global temperature observed through the end of 2017. The observational temperature data came from multiple sources, including NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies Surface Temperature Analysis (GISTEMP) time series, an estimate of global surface temperature change.

The results: 10 of the model projections closely matched observations. Moreover, after accounting for differences between modeled and actual changes in atmospheric carbon dioxide and other factors that drive climate, the number increased to 14. The authors found no evidence that the climate models evaluated either systematically overestimated or underestimated warming over the period of their projections.

All based on adjusted fraudulent temperature records.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1701176488018804847

[shtferbrains]

Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds
"From a quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, according to a new study published in the journal Nature Climate Change on April 25.

An international team of 32 authors from 24 institutions in eight countries led the effort, which involved using satellite data from NASA’s Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer instruments to help determine the leaf area index, or amount of leaf cover, over the planet’s vegetated regions. The greening represents an increase in leaves on plants and trees equivalent in area to two times the continental United States."


I guess if Chuck can re-post for emphasis ,we all can?

"The greening represents an increase in leaves on plants and trees equivalent in area to two times the continental United States."

[chuckChuck]

"All based on adjusted fraudulent temperature records." Says who? LOL

More climate change denial and crap from Twitter and the equivalent of Info Wars? Give up!

Where is some actual scientific evidence instead of the mindless climate change denial rhetoric?

[sumdumguy]

More climate change denial and crap from Twitter and Info Wars? LOL

Where is some actual scientific evidence instead of the mindless climate change denial rhetoric?

Where’s all Gore’s shorelines under water? Give up with the false prophets and BS. You whacko scammers have made enough with your Climate Cult crap. Get a Life!

[chuckChuck]

But still no scientific evidence? LOL

[AlbertaFarmer5]

"All based on adjusted fraudulent temperature records." Says who? LOL

More climate change denial and crap from Twitter and the equivalent of Info Wars? Give up!

Where is some actual scientific evidence instead of the mindless climate change denial rhetoric?

You could just admit that you didn't follow the link.

The link is two graphs by the denier organization known as NASA starting in 1885. One from 1999, one from 2019. Showing the drastic adjustments NASA made to the 1999 graph to create an uptrend in the 2019 where there was none.

[shtferbrains]

My post came directly from the NASA website.

Chuck is finally agreeing with us.

NASA is no longer a credible scientific organization.

Possible they were always just there to support the current doctrines being pushed by the US government?

[fjlip]

But still no scientific evidence? LOL

You wouldn't know EVIDENCE if it BIT you in the AZZ!