you wonder if things could get worse. new thread sorry glenn

[chuckChuck]

Calling the guy who calls out and describes racism and stereotyping, a racist doesn't work.

It's the comeback of people who don't have good arguments.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Right from the start Downder's posts have been feeding into the racist sterotype without him accepting and realizing what he is doing.

As far as I can see, the only instance of racist stereotyping in this thread was when you said the following:
aboriginals as thieves and alcoholics. No one had to said anything about the race of the perpetrator or victim before you made that blatant racist stereotype.

May I ask you a favor, please don't ever leave us. Turning your words around and using them against you is the best entertainment. And you are so obliging to provide such generous opportunities over and over and over again. You walk into every trap we set. You say hypocritical things, contradicting yourself within nearly every thread, often within the same posts. I don't know how I would fill that hole in my life if you weren't here to provide our daily comic relief and entertainment.

[chuckChuck]

Yup and you thought I was advocating killing somebodies mother too! LOL

We know you love being a troll and i enjoy skewering you and the usual suspects and your lame arguments as well.

But just because I described what Landownunders 2 threads were doing does not mean I share those views.

It's the same ineffective tack you used before. But if that is the best you got keep it coming. LOL

[AlbertaFarmer5]

It's the same ineffective tack you used before.

See, there you go stereotyping again. Trying to stereotype me as a cowboy, even worse, trying to stereotype me as a cowboy who reuses ineffective tack. Incorrect on both accusations. I I'm not a cowboy, I do not even own a horse, or any tack. And if I did own any tack, I assure you it would be very effective. Although, admittedly, if I did possess any tack, I definitely would use the same tack over and over again, it is not single use. Tack is not intended to be disposable, unlike electric vehicles for example.

[chuckChuck]

Its a sailing term. Not that I have sailed much. But it means to change your approach to the wind or something like that.

But don't let that stop you from ineffectively trying to twist my words. LOL

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Its a soiling term. Not that I have sailed much. But it means to change your approach to the wind or something like that.

But don't let that stop you from innaffectavely trying to twist my words. LOL

Soiling? Now you are stereotyping me as someone who has a history of soiling themselves? That's a lot of stereotyping for one thread from the guy who claims to be defending against such practices.

[chuckChuck]

Now that I think about it it might be a pretty apt word to describe you and your lame arguments! LOL

[goalieguy847]

I just dont understand.. how anyone could possibly be racist?
I mean..

Being negative toward a group of people..based on how they all behave?


Absurd
( this is a joke by the way)
Ill timed. Sure. But well placed....

Definitely..

[AlbertaFarmer5]

I think we are starting to get to Chuck this morning. His normally impeccable spelling and grammar is starting to look like something that foragefarmer wrote in a fit of drunken rage. What is an"innaffectavely" anyways?
Is it possible that the word you were looking for instead of tack was actually tactic?

[chuckChuck]

Nothing like a little spell check and editing now and again.

But what you need is an "argument" check to stop you from "soiling" yourself again and again with dumb ideas and ineffective arguments! LOL

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Not that I have sailed much.

Well this is awkward. In another thread today, you stated you have sometimes paid for travel vaccines. Given your attitude towards fossil fuels and climate change, how did you possibly travel to any destination which would require travel vaccines without either sailing or using a fossil fuel powered plane or boat?
Even Greta recognized the hypocrisy in traveling to climate conferences by plane, and made a media stunt using a sailboat. You wouldn't be hypocritically lecturing and chastising everyone else about the danger of fossil fuels, while simultaneously making unnecessary travel to a tourist destination using fossil fuel would you?

[chuckChuck]

Well this is awkward. In another thread today, you stated you have sometimes paid for travel vaccines. Given your attitude towards fossil fuels and climate change, how did you possibly travel to any destination which would require travel vaccines without either sailing or using a fossil fuel powered plane or boat?
Even Greta recognized the hypocrisy in traveling to climate conferences by plane, and made a media stunt using a sailboat. You wouldn't be hypocritically lecturing and chastising everyone else about the danger of fossil fuels, while simultaneously making unnecessary travel to a tourist destination using fossil fuel would you?

Try to focus there A5 you seem to be off on another tack because the last one didn't work? LOL