Rural Issues

[WiltonRanch]

For the record, I have never advocated for canceling anyone I disagree with. That is the left purview, we can be better than that
I am quite happy that you are willing take opposite side of every issue so we can have a debate. This site would be incredibly boring if we all just agreed with each other all the time. I appreciate being exposed to the opposite viewpoint and forcing myself to challenge my own preconceived notions.
You're debating style on the other hand,could definitely use a lot of improvements, but you get full points for your tenacity.

Yes the tenacity should be commended. Even when I seldom agree I get shit on. It’s a weird ass exchange but I’d never want to boot someone for being a disagreeable person. Certain ones years ago got booted for being hateful and racist and adding nothing to the chats but hate.

[WiltonRanch]

But you don't mind it if you agree with their opinions? Then the name calling and personal attacks are okay?

Because the usual suspects never call their friends out! A double standard perhaps?

BTW where is that covid link you are hiding from posting? LOL If its good let everybody see it.

Name Calling? Shit you have a name for us as well lol. Otherwise I seldom agree with a lot of what you say but when I do I make note of it like a decent person should do. You are the foil of many here but your tenacity is like that of a black angus bull fighting a herd of charolais bulls.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

While I can be socially awkward, luckily I’m not nearly at the level that makes me feel an LOL is required at the end of everything.

Hmmm, another very subtle hint, still not sure who you might be referring to.

[Landdownunder]

While I can be socially awkward, luckily I’m not nearly at the level that makes me feel an LOL is required at the end of everything.

Very very clever love your humour here goes LOL first time ever and last

[chuckChuck]

In real life there are people who do laugh a lot. And joke around and kid.

And then there are the straight faced serious ones who never crack a smile. And there are lots of people who are in between. To each their own.

So yes I laugh at lot at the stupidity of some comments and I love annoying the people who are bothered by all the LOLs. And that's why I call it Agrisilly.

More importantly can you defend your opinion and arguments with credible evidence? On that point most of the usual suspects don't even try. LOL!

[AlbertaFarmer5]

In real life there are people who do laugh a lot. And joke around and kid.

And then there are the straight faced serious ones who never crack a smile. And there are lots of people who are in between. To each their own.

So yes I laugh at lot at the stupidity of some comments and I love annoying the people who are bothered by all the LOLs. And that's why I call it Agrisilly.

More importantly can you defend your opinion and arguments with credible evidence? On that point most of the usual suspects don't even try. LOL!

Putting the silly in the agrisilly, one LOL at a time.
You don't strike me as the type who laughs and jokes all the time. In fact I don't think I can recall you ever acknowledging or making a joke. The only person or poster I've ever encountered with less of a sense of humor would be forage farmer.
And if the joke requires the jokester to tell his audience that it's a joke by adding lol, then I think you're in the wrong line of work.

[Blaithin]

In real life there are people who do laugh a lot. And joke around and kid.

And then there are the straight faced serious ones who never crack a smile. And there are lots of people who are in between. To each their own.

So yes I laugh at lot at the stupidity of some comments and I love annoying the people who are bothered by all the LOLs. And that's why I call it Agrisilly.

More importantly can you defend your opinion and arguments with credible evidence? On that point most of the usual suspects don't even try. LOL!

Your LOLs would be the #1 reason I consider you a troll, which you just nicely confirmed, but again, not something that’s new news to anyone here.

In an ironic twist, prolific trolls pretty much completely lack all credibility, no matter what evidence they cut and paste. Which would be unfortunate for you if you actually wanted to have a legitimate conversation with anyone. Luckily, you do not seem too.

[shtferbrains]

Post #30 was an LOL for sure.

[binthere]

That LOL is tell tale kamala harris.

[Landdownunder]

when one of the wittiest most sincere respectful tolerant intelligent chicken loving poster suggests some is a troll ,probably should listen.

maybe try to do better even

just a thought thats all

[Blaithin]

Takes a troll to spot a troll is all.

Fe Fi Fo Fum.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

when one of the wittiest most sincere respectful tolerant intelligent chicken loving poster suggests some is a troll ,probably should listen.

maybe try to do better even

just a thought thats all

And it's not only the witty intelligent chicken lady who has called Chuck out. So does the other witty intelligent respectful female member. So does the admin, who last I know of was a female from Eastern Canada, for most likely has political views different from most of the members. So do the two members from the land down under. So does the resident lesbian who called him out for hate speech. So does the resident electric vehicle aficionado who's called him out for not having a clue what he's talking about. So does the resident goalie guy who supports the same causes, but admits it's impossible to support Chuck due to the attitude problem. So do countless other left-wing posters who used to come to his defense but appear to have given it up as a lost cause.

I think the only two posters who haven't called out his bad behavior would be his two remaining former CWB brethren.