Originally posted by Blaithin
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Emergency evaluations…
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
-
I sure get a lot of responses and push back for a guy being ignored! LOL
The evacuees in some counties west of Edmonton won't be going back home untill at least a week because the fires are not under control and hot a dry weather is returning. Residents will justifiably be unhappy.
But residents elect their county councilors and reeves from the communities they serve and the counties are the ones that are declaring states of emergencies and mandatory evacuations.
So if the mandatory evacuations aren't needed, why are the councilors and reeves from the very communities supporting them?
Comment
-
Originally posted by cropgrower View Posthave you any new report on Danny for us ?
Its gotta be the UCPs and Danny Smith's fault don't you think?
That wont be good for Danny's election hopes. But since Calgary is not on fire maybe it wont matter.
So what is wrong with all those county reeves and councilors who don't agree with the anti government types who don't support mandatory evacuations and emergency maesures?
Where is the anti government revolution so many of you talk about and want in rural Alberta?
Comment
-
Originally posted by cropgrower View Posthave you any new report on Danny for us ?
Because I would really be jealous if he came all the way to Alberta to stalk the premier, and didn't even stop by to stalk me in person. We were rained out after all, I had the time.Last edited by AlbertaFarmer5; May 12, 2023, 11:56.
Comment
-
But you still haven't answered the question. Probably because you know that the libertarian view of evacuations doesn't cut it. Even in rural Alberta.
So if the mandatory evacuations aren't needed, why are the councilors and reeves from the very communities supporting them?
Comment
-
Originally posted by chuckChuck View PostBut you still haven't answered the question. Probably because you know that the libertarian view of evacuations doesn't cut it. Even in rural Alberta.
So if the mandatory evacuations aren't needed, why are the councilors and reeves from the very communities supporting them?
Comment
-
For the 85-90% of emergency workers who use a little common sense… thanks for your : patience, help, dedication, and sacrifice.
We are blessed to have spirited passionate people who do care and are humble enough to know when those who are themselves sacrificing to provide backup and very needed resources …. In extremely difficult situations.
God Bless Alberta…. Many did get enough rain to green the grass and trees… we are thankful for these blessings!
Cheers
Comment
-
Originally posted by Blaithin View PostTo cover their asses so they don’t get sued by someone who’s an idiot and claims they weren’t told how serious the issue is.
The only reason they support mandatory evacuations is they don't want to be sued? Huh? You would say that in a public meeting?
You don't think that they might also think public safety might be a good reason?
Comment
-
Originally posted by chuckChuck View PostBlaithin, that's a pretty cynical view of your fellow citizens and county councilors!
The only reason they support mandatory evacuations is they don't want to be sued? Huh? You would say that in a public meeting?
You don't think that they might also think public safety might be a good reason?
Cynical, sure. Realistic, also sure.Last edited by Blaithin; May 12, 2023, 16:57.
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment