Poilievre says climate change is real.

[Guest]

In California? Worst ever.climate gauged taking in consideration the whole globe.not just what you see out your window.

What the **** are you talking about ?

[Guest]

Member how they milked the wildfires in Oz , then it rained for two years ?

[furrowtickler]

Changing climate does not ignite fires.But when they are results are getting worse every year because of forest conditions caused by a changing climate.

Hopefully this is the start of what exactly I just said
Some great rains in the northern forests already.
Great to see …


Will be some relief for those northern communities…….. a bit late but it’s happening now ….

[furrowtickler]

In California? Worst ever.climate gauged taking in consideration the whole globe.not just what you see out your window.

Much like the extreme alarmism over the “atmospheric river “ in California a few years ago …. Like no one ever seen that in history hahaha
Well , that was immediately put to rest with the massive floods in the later 1800’s that were far worse and documented….. whoopsie

[chuckChuck]

One year, one fire, one region doesn't tell the whole story.

You need to look at climate and the affects of climate change over decades and over a wide geographic area not just in your backyard or from your flawed and biased selective memories.

This paper presents fire regime trends nationally and within two zonation systems, the homogeneous fire regime zones and ecozones, for two time periods: 1959-2015 and 1980-2015. Nationally, trends in both area burned and number of large fires (≥ 200 ha) have increased significantly since 1959, which might be due to increases in lightning-caused fires. Human-caused fires, in contrast, have shown a decline. Results suggest that large fires have been getting larger over the last 57 years, and that the fire season has been starting approximately one week earlier and ending one week later. At the regional level, trends in fire regimes are variable across the country, with fewer significant trends. Area burned, number of large fires, and lightning-caused fires are increasing in most of western Canada, whereas human-caused fires are either stable or declining throughout the country. Overall, Canadian forests appear to be engaged in a trajectory towards more active fire regimes over the last half century.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

One year, one fire, one region doesn't tell the whole story.

You need to look at climate and the affects of climate change over decades and over a wide geographic area not just in your backyard or from your flawed and biased selective memories.

Thank you for that explanation. I will keep that in mind next time I read an alarmist headline about one weather event in one region in one year, and how it is definitive proof of climate change.

[newguy]

Much like the extreme alarmism over the “atmospheric river “ in California a few years ago …. Like no one ever seen that in history hahaha
Well , that was immediately put to rest with the massive floods in the later 1800’s that were far worse and documented….. whoopsie

Just curious.what political leader represents your views.

[WiltonRanch]

Much like the extreme alarmism over the “atmospheric river “ in California a few years ago …. Like no one ever seen that in history hahaha
Well , that was immediately put to rest with the massive floods in the later 1800’s that were far worse and documented….. whoopsie

Didn’t they used to call it the Pineapple Express?

[furrowtickler]

Didn’t they used to call it the Pineapple Express?

Yup , just a play on words now to push alarmism
Been the same for a millennia

[fjlip]

Just curious.what political leader represents your views.

Yes admit it's the phucking Turd.

[newguy]

Yes admit it's the phucking Turd.

Most main stream leaders believe humans have had a negative impact on the climate. So pretty much all the leaders believe what I believe.what about you.?

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Most main stream leaders believe humans have had a negative impact on the climate. So pretty much all the leaders believe what I believe.what about you.?

Since when does science have anything to do with what anyone believes? Let alone what uneducated politicians believe in? Does more people in high positions believing in something make it more true?
The history of religion would suggest otherwise. Including the newest religion, climate change.

[furrowtickler]

Most main stream leaders believe humans have had a negative impact on the climate. So pretty much all the leaders believe what I believe.what about you.?

They believe what the UN tells them , fact
So you have been sucked into the huge propaganda machine, don’t be proud of that btw .

[furrowtickler]

Just curious.what political leader represents your views.

Well the absolute last on earth is silver spoon , black face , pure white privileged, narcissistic Trudeau
I really like Kristi Noem out of South Dakota . Her economic and social policies through Covid were by far and above the best in North America.
There is no federal political leader in Canada right now worth the time of day .

[newguy]

Well the absolute last on earth is silver spoon , black face , pure white privileged, narcissistic Trudeau
I really like Kristi Noem out of South Dakota . Her economic and social policies through Covid were by far and above the best in North America.
There is no federal political leader in Canada right now worth the time of day .

She had one of the highest death rates with the most spread out population too.