I knew chuck was deficient in basic math and economics but simple statistics really threw him for a loop.
Read the study again chuck, a group of scientists created a statistical sampling of the rates of serious adverse effects from the vaccine which are 10 times more frequent than 3 other vaccines that got pulled from the market.
Its about as clear as day for anyone with a brain. Extrapolate that over 7B doses given in the world and the result is a crime against humanity from your renowned experts.
Chuck crowed like a fool about a single grandma dying in the home and called for the unvaxxed to be rounded up in camps and denied basic services. Now he deflects and hides when the studies are showing the vax killed or maimed more people than died from covid.
On 99M doses given in Canada, there are literally several hundred thousand vax injuries in Canada alone.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Vaccines
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
Originally posted by chuckChuck View PostThat absurd and ridiculous unrealistic scenario is just about as stupid as your idea that we are going to run low on CO2! LOL
I generally ignore when you bring this up, we have rehashed this enough times to know that you haven't got The slightest idea of how long CO2 would remain in the atmosphere, and therefore not the slightest clue how long before levels would be low enough to be a problem again.
But it is hilarious that you bring it up in this context.
As we have established, you don't have any idea how many adverse events would be acceptable from a COVID vaccine. But we have narrowed it down to one in two being too high, and one in 10,000 being acceptable. Anything within that range, you would defer to the experts and take it if they tell you to.
The sounds vaguely familiar to the CO2 residence time debates. Where after weeks of proding on my part, and exhaustive "research" on your part, you established that The residence time is somewhere between a few months and millions of years. And according to you, the fact that neither you nor your credible scientists can narrow that down, is irrelevant to the revolution to eliminate CO2. Just like your attitude to vaccine injury or death.
Your positions are obviously not science-based, but ideologically based. But don't let that stop you from telling everyone else to " believe in the science".
Or have you since figured out the residence time of CO2, and you bring it up at every opportunity hoping someone will give you the chance to share this newfound knowledge?Last edited by AlbertaFarmer5; Oct 5, 2023, 15:19.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by chuckChuck View PostThat absurd and ridiculous unrealistic scenario is just about as stupid as your idea that we are going to run low on CO2! LOL
Now are the chief medical health officers wrong about covid vaccines and their safety? Yes or No?
Leave a comment:
-
So nobody can understand the stats except the experts, trust the experts, now that’s a real laugh!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by chuckChuck View PostYour choice, but the health professional including all the provincial chief medical officers in Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta are all still recommending covid vaccinations!
Are they all wrong about the benefits vs risk? LOL
And you are more qualified to know?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View PostSo do I understand you correctly, you don't consider yourself qualified to assess the risk. You defer to the opinion of experts.
So if every second person died from the vaccination, but the provincial chief medical officers still recommend getting vaccinated, you would get vaccinated, and you would take your children or grandchildren to get vaccinated as well. Because the experts told you to, and you as an unqualified layman or not capable of evaluating the information yourself.
Now are the chief medical health officers wrong about covid vaccines and their safety? Yes or No?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by chuckChuck View PostI am not qualified either but at least I trust people who are qualified to asses the risk.
All the provincial chief medical officers in Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta are all still recommending covid vaccinations!
Are they wrong? yes or no?
So if every second person died from the vaccination, but the provincial chief medical officers still recommend getting vaccinated, you would get vaccinated, and you would take your children or grandchildren to get vaccinated as well. Because the experts told you to, and you as an unqualified layman or not capable of evaluating the information yourself.Last edited by AlbertaFarmer5; Oct 5, 2023, 12:13.
Leave a comment:
-
I am not qualified either but at least I trust people who are qualified to asses the risk.
All the provincial chief medical officers in Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta are all still recommending covid vaccinations!
Are they wrong? yes or no?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
And you are more qualified to know?
You have presented 1 in 10,000 as being an acceptable risk.
Since you have decided that is a risk you are willing to accept, I assume you must have some level or risk which you aren't willing to accept, what number would that be? How did you conclude that 1 in 10,000 is acceptable?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by chuckChuck View PostYour choice, but the health professional including all the provincial chief medical officers in Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta are all still recommending covid vaccinations!
You can buy a model T Ford in any color as long as it is black.
Leave a comment:
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Leave a comment: