Vaccines

[chuckChuck]

So you never says farmers do this or that you always say I do this or that and never talk about farmers as a whole even though you are a member of the group? Interesting.

[jazz]

Here is a little throwback to chucks experts. Spraying kids with DDT as recommended by health experts and your govt. Even saying people cant eat it.

[chuckChuck]

DDT was banned in 1972 in the USA after they found it had serious environmental impacts.

Try to keep up J ass that was 50 years ago and science has improved since then. But not your thinking! LOL

In 1972, EPA issued a cancellation order for DDT based on its adverse environmental effects, such as those to wildlife, as well as its potential human health risks. Since then, studies have continued, and a relationship between DDT exposure and reproductive effects in humans is suspected, based on studies in animals. In addition, some animals exposed to DDT in studies developed liver tumors. As a result, today, DDT is classified as a probable human carcinogen by U.S. and international authorities.

DDT is:

known to be very persistent in the environment,
will accumulate in fatty tissues, and
can travel long distances in the upper atmosphere.

After the use of DDT was discontinued in the United States, its concentration in the environment and animals has decreased, but because of its persistence, residues of concern from historical use still remain.

[cropgrower]

so if you were around when that was being done , would you say government knows best and attack anybody that said mabe do a bit more research and wait ? or would you have been in the wait a while and learn a bit more group ?

[Guest]

Farmers in the third person includes me and our 6000 acres.

I am not qualified to analyze health and vaccine data either, but at least I trust that the experts can!

Now where is Bin Lurking hiding? He was supposed to get back to us with some "new" math. Or some alternative facts?

I'll be moving this discussion to the commodity marketing thread when I have more time, maybe this weekend. Chuck trusts the deception experts. He doesn't know that he doesn't know.

[cropgrower]

Nope. That's not what I'm referring to.
Warning, critical thinking required.
Chuck et al need not apply. First paragraph. The .011% is in the second paragraph.
Leave it with you a bit longer.

very clear to see what is going on , will also give CC more time , shud be no bother for somebody that thinks we farmers cant understand numbers , the critical thinking part could be the problem tho 🤔

[jazz]

chuck isnt going to wiggle out of this one with his marxist BS.

[chuckChuck]

One study does not tell the whole story of vaccine risk!

[cropgrower]

Average of 10.1 and 15.1 = 12.6 , thats 12.6 serious adverse events per 10,000 or one in 793 , is that simple enough for you to understand CC LOL , as time goes on its gets easier to understand how you got conned LOL

[chuckChuck]

Adverse reactions include soreness at the injection site. The more important number is serious adverse side effects.

In Canada Out of the more than 99,000,000 doses the number of serious side effects reported were only 10,893 or as stated 0.011%. 1 for every 9088 vaccinations. Significant but the very small risk has to measured against the benefit of saving thousands of lives especially seniors.