• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

With green energy halt, UCP declares a moratorium on Alberta's reputation

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/editorials/article-why-are-the-provinces-so-resistant-to-clean-power/

    opinion
    The provinces have to embrace clean power. Alberta instead leads a resistance
    The Editorial Board
    Published 1 hour ago

    Remember the goal of 1.5 degrees Celsius? That, of course, was the basis of the Paris Agreement in 2015 – the landmark global deal to limit human-caused climate heating to, ideally, 1.5 C, or, at worst, well below 2 C.

    The numbers weren’t conjured out of nothing. Every fraction of heating matters. The latest science shows July, the hottest month on record, breached 1.5 C. Extreme heat everywhere, Antarctica melting, wildfires and floods: Welcome to the future. Now picture what heating of more than 2 C would be like. That’s the current trajectory, propelled by the ongoing bonfire of fossil fuels.

    What’s necessary, scientists have long argued, is “rapid, far-reaching and unprecedented” changes in how countries operate, starting with energy production. The technology, led by wind and solar power, is ready and affordable. Change is happening – the International Energy Agency expects, for the first time, more global spending on solar power this year than on oil. But it’s not enough.

    This is the essential context for the broiling climate debates in Canada. At the fore is the federal Liberals’ pending clean electricity regulations, a set of rules that aim to cut emissions from fossil fuels out of power generation by 2035. Canada has a huge head start, with more than 80 per cent of power in the country generated by hydro, nuclear and wind.

    Cleaning up the rest – alongside expanding the grid as sectors like transport are electrified – is an essential part of Canada meeting its Paris treaty commitment to slash emissions. Despite the urgency, provinces are failing to deliver.

    In the business of electricity, Canada is 10 different countries. The provinces export more power to the United States than to each other. But instead of a new spirit of collaboration and innovation, the provinces are saying no to the goal of clean power by 2035.

    Ontario is adding more fossil fuel power. Saskatchewan flat-out rejects Ottawa’s goals. In Manitoba, which is already almost 100 per cent clean with its bounty of hydro, the province last week somehow concluded that to clean up the rest of its grid by 2035 is “not feasible.”

    The absence of ambition is staggering.

    The worst, however, may be Alberta. The province, with its open power market driven by private investments, is Canada’s wind and solar leader. Renewables produced 17.3 per cent of Alberta’s power in 2022, almost double four years earlier. Many more billions of dollars of investments in solar, wind and energy storage have been proposed.

    So what does Alberta do? Last week it halted development of new solar and wind projects until next winter. The United Conservative Party government claims it may need to step in and slow progress, because things are happening too fast. The UCP is all for the free market, but doesn’t like what’s happening in the free market.

    It’s the same in Texas. The state’s open power market led to a boom in renewables. Right-wing lawmakers this year fought back to favour fossil fuels and discourage renewables.

    Alberta is a “natural gas province,” Premier Danielle Smith says. A top UCP goal is to resist Ottawa’s clean power rules. Like every province, Alberta has reasonable concerns about the impact of overly rapid changes in the electrical grid. Reliability and affordable costs are key. But the province’s opposition ignores its potential. Change is possible. In 2015, about two-thirds of Alberta’s power came from coal. The Alberta NDP put the province on a path to get off coal by 2030; it’ll happen this year.

    After that successful, and fast, shift, the UCP now insists Alberta has to rely on natural gas for years to come. What it should do is start building the grid of the future, decentralized, interconnected across Western Canada, able to handle intermittency with an abundance of storage, and able to manage through peak demand in the coldest months of winter. Rather than rise to the challenge, the message Alberta broadcasts is: It can’t be done.

    It can be done. The Pembina Institute and the Canada Energy Regulator in recent months have detailed how. Whether it all happens exactly by 2035 is a distraction. Fighting over a deadline, rather than figuring out solutions, isn’t the answer.

    The mission and urgency are clear. Clean power, aside from zero emissions, promises lower electricity bills. The challenges brought on by rapid change can be overcome. There are more opportunities than risks. The provinces need to stop resisting change and get to work.

    Comment


      #32
      Click image for larger version

Name:	oil vs solar investment IEA.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	11.4 KB
ID:	775458

      From the International Energy Agency

      Comment


        #33
        So if we don’t decarbonize our electrical generation the world will go to hell in a hand basket eh Chuck2!? Funny you didn’t respond to the fact that China will add enough coal generation in the first 6 months to power western Canada. Nope, we have to keep covering good productive land with Chinese solar panels. On the plus side Chuck 2, as you will see below at 7:15 this morning, wind generation was up to 14.2% of capacity, hydro was at 19.6% and of course solar was just waking up. Reality far different than the propaganda.

        Comment


          #34
          All the solar and wind need is bulldozers and a BIG hole. Footnote in history....oops boo boo

          Comment


            #35
            I farm in the special areas of alberta. I am curious why the special areas board under the direction of the minister of municipal affairs will have no wind or solar on grazing leases or crown land? In the past community pastures and ranchers grazing leases had lots of oil and gas activity. Wind and solar have to be on deeded land. Local land owner has two wind mills, one per quarter. The land had a mortgage with fcc and their condition was a transfer of the mortgage to free and clear land that he owned. Fcc will not hold a mortgage on land with wind mills. The wind company paid the local farmer $1000 of good will money per adjacent quarter to offset propeller flash and noise. One more condition from the wind company was that the farmer had to ask for permission from them to construct anything that might disrupt the wind.

            Also curious why a caveat is placed on the whole quarter and not just the wind mill area and access road like oil and gas?

            Local farmer has just received a letter from the national bank of canada that the wind mill quarters and good will quarters all have caveats against the whole quarter. Who actually owns or is liable on these quarters going forward? Something seems fishy here.

            Comment


              #36
              Thanks for sharing those details, chief. I hadn't heard of any of those before.
              From my perspective on the wet side of the province, it seems to me that installing wind and solar on grazing leases in the special areas would make far more sense than installing them on the most productive farmland in the province, as they keep doing out here.
              Is it possible that a solar farm could actually increase the productivity of pasture in an area where heat is in excess and rain is in deficit.
              You get half as much rain as we do, and far more sunshine. So if you stop half of that Sunshine from hitting the ground, and concentrate the rain that runs off one solar panel into an area shaded by the solar panel ahead of it, you would create conditions or similar to what we have out here, on how much reduced area. The livestock would appreciate the shade and something to block the wind. It's not going to affect any future development, since it is unlikely anyone will be creating housing developments there. Very few neighbors to complain.
              Or maybe I am just being a NIMBY.

              Comment


                #37
                CC… the opinion piece from the Globe and Tale (Mail) you quoted says this:
                “The numbers weren’t conjured out of nothing. Every fraction of heating matters. The latest science shows July, the hottest month on record, breached 1.5 C. Extreme heat everywhere, Antarctica melting, wildfires and floods: Welcome to the future. Now picture what heating of more than 2 C would be like. That’s the current trajectory, propelled by the ongoing bonfire of fossil fuels.

                What’s necessary, scientists have long argued, is “rapid, far-reaching and unprecedented” changes in how countries operate, starting with energy production. The technology, led by wind and solar power, is ready and affordable. ”

                Our farm is having one of our cooler summers… not hotter. Manipulation of statistics is as old as misrepresentation of humanity getting smarter through evolution and natural selection… B…S… if climate change advocates keep it up… then we will be in trouble for certain….

                No one…No AI, human nor animals … has any real guaranteed…practical actual knowledge about : what weather, sun radiation, earth ocean temperatures… will be a year from now… let alone 2030 or 2050.

                The scare tactics and misguided misinformation being advertised by the woke left wing politicians… is absolutely suspicious and suspect… anyone who believes otherwise…. Is as irresponsible as Stalin, Mao, or any other of the famous historical tyrants.

                Blessings and Prayers

                Comment


                  #38
                  If they put the solar panels high enough for cattle to walk under it might work. Not the case with the solar farms they have built so far.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by Chief View Post
                    I farm in the special areas of alberta. I am curious why the special areas board under the direction of the minister of municipal affairs will have no wind or solar on grazing leases or crown land? In the past community pastures and ranchers grazing leases had lots of oil and gas activity. Wind and solar have to be on deeded land. Local land owner has two wind mills, one per quarter. The land had a mortgage with fcc and their condition was a transfer of the mortgage to free and clear land that he owned. Fcc will not hold a mortgage on land with wind mills. The wind company paid the local farmer $1000 of good will money per adjacent quarter to offset propeller flash and noise. One more condition from the wind company was that the farmer had to ask for permission from them to construct anything that might disrupt the wind.

                    Also curious why a caveat is placed on the whole quarter and not just the wind mill area and access road like oil and gas?

                    Local farmer has just received a letter from the national bank of canada that the wind mill quarters and good will quarters all have caveats against the whole quarter. Who actually owns or is liable on these quarters going forward? Something seems fishy here.
                    Very interesting. My question is if you can’t have a mortgage on a windmill quarter does it make it impossible to sell that quarter?! And why would FCC with their ESG outlook not want that quarter used as security?!

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Questions I would like answers to as well.

                      Comment


                        #41
                        Because there is a RISK of liability, devalued due to MONSTROSITY bird grinder. And perhaps they know it's all SHIT!

                        Comment


                          #42
                          Originally posted by Chief View Post
                          If they put the solar panels high enough for cattle to walk under it might work. Not the case with the solar farms they have built so far.
                          Would it matter? A cow will get down on her knees to eat under an obstacle, or reach 6 feet past the fence by sticking her head through the bottom wires. I think they could find a way to eat under a solar panel.

                          Comment


                            #43
                            Originally posted by Hamloc View Post
                            On the plus side Chuck 2, as you will see below at 7:15 this morning, wind generation was up to 14.2% of capacity, hydro was at 19.6% and of course solar was just waking up. Reality far different than the propaganda.
                            And it has been all downhill since then. Wind in AB has spent most of the day below 10% of capacity. This has been the trend every day lately while it has been hot. A few days were between 0.05% and 3% all day.
                            Yet, in the middle of winter when we point out to Chuck that the wind doesn't blow on really cold days when demand is highest, and there is no solar, he reassures us that there is another demand peak in the middle of summer for AC. This would be that demand peak, and just like the demand peak in winter, wind is no help at all.

                            Comment


                              #44
                              Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
                              Would it matter? A cow will get down on her knees to eat under an obstacle, or reach 6 feet past the fence by sticking her head through the bottom wires. I think they could find a way to eat under a solar panel.
                              At the height they are at you could mount lewis cattle oilers. That would be handy. You have to think outside the box.

                              Comment


                                #45
                                Solar panels belong in cities where the most power is required at peak times .
                                Still think it’s idiotic to build solar panel systems way out in the middle of nowhere then bury cable or run high lines to cities . Seems a tremendous waste of resources

                                Comment

                                • Reply to this Thread
                                • Return to Topic List
                                Working...