• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

With green energy halt, UCP declares a moratorium on Alberta's reputation

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
    Human sacrifice would be the closest comparison. Both share the following features:

    Government sanctioned. Would not occur without huge government mandates.
    Destroys productivity.
    Done to appease mythical being.
    Keeps the populace in fear.
    Completely ineffective.
    Can not be disproven(every weather event is blamed on climate change), therefore is not scientific at all.
    Doesn't negatively affect those in power, only the peasants who pay the ultimate price.
    etc.
    After posting the above, I read this today:

    Ireland is thinking about killing off 200,000 cows to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This is lunacy. Net Zero has become a neo-pagan religion, sacrificing animals to appease the weather gods. The elites have lost their marbles, says Brendan O’Neill

    Comment


      #62
      Anyone who thinks that higher CO2 levels would be good for the planet and going back to pliocene would be fine, has disqualified themselves from intelligent conversations about the energy transition!

      Its just more flat earth logic! LOL

      Comment


        #63
        Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
        Anyone who thinks that higher CO2 levels would be good for the planet and going back to pliocene would be fine, has disqualified themselves from intelligent conversations about the energy transition!

        Its just more flat earth logic! LOL
        Anybody who thinks that covering good productive farmland with Chinese solar panels is a technological advancement should be disqualified from being a farmer and from intelligent conversations about sound energy solutions!!!
        Last edited by Hamloc; Aug 18, 2023, 07:08.

        Comment


          #64
          Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
          Anyone who thinks that higher CO2 levels would be good for the planet and going back to pliocene would be fine, has disqualified themselves from intelligent conversations about the energy transition!

          Its just more flat earth logic! LOL
          So, what is the correct level of CO2?
          The Earth has survived through levels as low as 180, to as high as 10,000 PPM. What is the Goldilocks level? Right in the middle of that range?

          Comment


            #65
            "intelligent conversations about the energy transition!"

            You haven't had one YET!

            Experts credible unnamed nobodies fake modeling BS

            Comment

            • Reply to this Thread
            • Return to Topic List
            Working...