Recently I read a letter to the editor in the local paper and it was about chopping up farm land for acreages. My point is not to start a debate on whether or not this is economically viable for the producer because in some cases that is the most money the producer will ever see for what comes from the land.
The increasing concern is whether or not municipal politics, particularly in county areas, will be dominated by people coming from acreages, which in turn would put more pressure on farmers i.e. regulations on when and how to spread manure.
People who derive their income from the land tend to spend money in the local community whereas people who derive their money elsewhere, also tend to spend elsewhere too.
Many development decisions are based on what will bring money into the coffers on a short-term basis versus what will happen over the long-term. Having zero development is not feasible, but neither is allowing any and all development to take place. A balance has to be struck so that diverse and competing interests can be addressed as best as possible.
Bottom line is we are not going to be making any more land, so we have to preserve what we have. Many of the development decisions are left to the muncipal planning councils and care must be taken to find an effective and sustainable balance.
What do some of the rest of you see as issues in the upcoming elections this fall? What should we be looking to our municipal governments to do?
The increasing concern is whether or not municipal politics, particularly in county areas, will be dominated by people coming from acreages, which in turn would put more pressure on farmers i.e. regulations on when and how to spread manure.
People who derive their income from the land tend to spend money in the local community whereas people who derive their money elsewhere, also tend to spend elsewhere too.
Many development decisions are based on what will bring money into the coffers on a short-term basis versus what will happen over the long-term. Having zero development is not feasible, but neither is allowing any and all development to take place. A balance has to be struck so that diverse and competing interests can be addressed as best as possible.
Bottom line is we are not going to be making any more land, so we have to preserve what we have. Many of the development decisions are left to the muncipal planning councils and care must be taken to find an effective and sustainable balance.
What do some of the rest of you see as issues in the upcoming elections this fall? What should we be looking to our municipal governments to do?
Comment