Many quite likely saw the judging controversy in the gymnastics competition at the Olympics. According to the rules, Paul Hamm is quite right - he did nothing wrong, but did he do what was right and keep with the true spirit and intent of the Olympic Games? Or was the endorsement prize package worth far too much to do the honorable thing? Is the endorsement package only a Western pheonomenon? Thing of the other athletes who won gold at the Olympics - Hicham El Gerrouj comes to mind - 2 gold medals, won admirably. Will he be endorsing the Morrocan equivalent of Wheaties over there? There are many athletes whose faces will never be gracing cereal boxes or tennis shoes.
Recently I was reading about a piece of land that has been designated as parkland on the northwest corner of Red Deer. The land is being considered for a firefighting training centre because there really isn't much of a parkland there anyway. Is this the best thing to do with the land and is it in keeping with the spirit of the original designation?
What if some effort were being put into making it a viable and all important wetland/parkland? We soon quickly forget with a little rain, just how devastating the last 3 years of drought have been. We are talking pipelines so that water can be pumped from the Red Deer River to outlying areas that are desperately short of water. Wouldn't having another wetland help in that regard? Shouldn't we be looking at initiating and maintaining these vital pieces of biodiversity for the future?
Don't get me wrong, I think that a firefighting training facility is a good thing. Isn't there other land designated industrial or commerical a better choice?
What sorts of things are happening in other areas? We keep hearing about environmental sustainability - shouldn't that be happening at the local level?
Recently I was reading about a piece of land that has been designated as parkland on the northwest corner of Red Deer. The land is being considered for a firefighting training centre because there really isn't much of a parkland there anyway. Is this the best thing to do with the land and is it in keeping with the spirit of the original designation?
What if some effort were being put into making it a viable and all important wetland/parkland? We soon quickly forget with a little rain, just how devastating the last 3 years of drought have been. We are talking pipelines so that water can be pumped from the Red Deer River to outlying areas that are desperately short of water. Wouldn't having another wetland help in that regard? Shouldn't we be looking at initiating and maintaining these vital pieces of biodiversity for the future?
Don't get me wrong, I think that a firefighting training facility is a good thing. Isn't there other land designated industrial or commerical a better choice?
What sorts of things are happening in other areas? We keep hearing about environmental sustainability - shouldn't that be happening at the local level?
Comment