I would also think that municipalities, whether richer or poorer, must consider how much it is going to cost to maintain the infrastructure versus the revenue that they will get from it, new developments etc. I have read several times that for each dollar spent on infrastructure, it costs another $1.15 to maintain it. Is that enough to be offset by the revenues? Municipalities make an awful lot of tax money off of acreage owners, so is it any wonder that they want them going in? It seems to me we need to be really careful about what we ask for because once there is pavement over it, we will have a hard time getting it back, if at all.
Increased growth does not necessarily mean that well-thought out planning goes right out the window.
Increased growth does not necessarily mean that well-thought out planning goes right out the window.
Comment