Horse I think that the difference between you and me is our views on what we consider to be “wealth”. As long as I have a wife and family that loves me…I’m the wealthiest man in the world. Materially no one envies me. I have seen men driven by jealousy…it is not a pretty picture.
You seem to be (forgive if I am wrong) hung up the notion that every one should be equal in their lifestyles etc. There is nothing “equal” about the quality of the land from one farm to the next. There is no equality when it comes to results in this risky business. The only place I know of where these ideas are pursued is in unions…where the poorer nurse and poorer teachers are never fired! If you are doing what you love then you have to accept it and just go on with your life and do what you do…best.
You seem to think that others, your friends and neighbors, are simply paid far too much for what they do and this is all accomplished at your expense. You think there is a “pot” somewhere that we all get reimbursed from. There isn’t!
I asked this question in another thread and there was no response to it but I will ask it again here. If 100-200 years ago as the western world was explored and settled had the law been…what ever is discovered out there, it belongs to all of us! What ever can be garnered from the land, no matter what your risk, it belongs to all of us! Would there ever have been a gold rush? Would anyone ever have taken risks? Would there ever have been a Leduc?
I guess you could say that I just don't accept todays premise that the "resourses" belong "equally" to all of us.
We live in a democracy (supposedly), and although not perfect…I wouldn’t trade our form of it for anything further to the left any where in the world. Saskatchewan is bad enough. It is a given that we will not all have equal results when we all have the freedom to make choices with what we do with our lives.
“Democracy is the UN-equal distribution of wealth; and socialism is the equal distribution of poverty.” Said, a great man. I accept that! The sooner you do the sooner you will be content.
I believe in property rights and I wish that there was no such thing as “leases”! I wish that all the land was deeded. In such a scenario…maybe you wouldn’t own any land. But if there are to be leases, then the man who gets the lease should be able to have the freedom to derive income out of it anyway he can. (We have been over this before) It is none of my business. I can rest in the fact that the money stays in Alberta (most I hope) and benefits your local economy.
However when an Alberta lessee, making good money and the Alberta oil patch man making good money, and the kid at Mac Donald’s, and your mechanic, and your grocer who are not making good money subsidize a lawyer in PEI or subsidize our friend stormnorm in Quebec when he grows wheat to the tune of $120.00 per acre …well there is where I draw the line.
I am happy for our Quebec friends, they have shown us the way, we should learn from them. I just wish we had western and federal governments that where as motivated to support your place and mine… but not cowman, he’s got more money than both of us put together….JUST KIDDING!!
If you want to fault me for that, then so be it, I am a WESTERN Canadian!
But it seems to me that if you or anyone else are not as emotional about Quebec farms being subsidized with Alberta money…WHERE THERE IS NO BENEFIT TO YOUR LOCAL ECONOMY (not shouting, just trying to point out the difference) why are you so exercised about your fellow Albertan getting what seems to appear to be a break?
Have a good night my friend.
“A slave is one who waits for someone else to free him”
You seem to be (forgive if I am wrong) hung up the notion that every one should be equal in their lifestyles etc. There is nothing “equal” about the quality of the land from one farm to the next. There is no equality when it comes to results in this risky business. The only place I know of where these ideas are pursued is in unions…where the poorer nurse and poorer teachers are never fired! If you are doing what you love then you have to accept it and just go on with your life and do what you do…best.
You seem to think that others, your friends and neighbors, are simply paid far too much for what they do and this is all accomplished at your expense. You think there is a “pot” somewhere that we all get reimbursed from. There isn’t!
I asked this question in another thread and there was no response to it but I will ask it again here. If 100-200 years ago as the western world was explored and settled had the law been…what ever is discovered out there, it belongs to all of us! What ever can be garnered from the land, no matter what your risk, it belongs to all of us! Would there ever have been a gold rush? Would anyone ever have taken risks? Would there ever have been a Leduc?
I guess you could say that I just don't accept todays premise that the "resourses" belong "equally" to all of us.
We live in a democracy (supposedly), and although not perfect…I wouldn’t trade our form of it for anything further to the left any where in the world. Saskatchewan is bad enough. It is a given that we will not all have equal results when we all have the freedom to make choices with what we do with our lives.
“Democracy is the UN-equal distribution of wealth; and socialism is the equal distribution of poverty.” Said, a great man. I accept that! The sooner you do the sooner you will be content.
I believe in property rights and I wish that there was no such thing as “leases”! I wish that all the land was deeded. In such a scenario…maybe you wouldn’t own any land. But if there are to be leases, then the man who gets the lease should be able to have the freedom to derive income out of it anyway he can. (We have been over this before) It is none of my business. I can rest in the fact that the money stays in Alberta (most I hope) and benefits your local economy.
However when an Alberta lessee, making good money and the Alberta oil patch man making good money, and the kid at Mac Donald’s, and your mechanic, and your grocer who are not making good money subsidize a lawyer in PEI or subsidize our friend stormnorm in Quebec when he grows wheat to the tune of $120.00 per acre …well there is where I draw the line.
I am happy for our Quebec friends, they have shown us the way, we should learn from them. I just wish we had western and federal governments that where as motivated to support your place and mine… but not cowman, he’s got more money than both of us put together….JUST KIDDING!!
If you want to fault me for that, then so be it, I am a WESTERN Canadian!
But it seems to me that if you or anyone else are not as emotional about Quebec farms being subsidized with Alberta money…WHERE THERE IS NO BENEFIT TO YOUR LOCAL ECONOMY (not shouting, just trying to point out the difference) why are you so exercised about your fellow Albertan getting what seems to appear to be a break?
Have a good night my friend.
“A slave is one who waits for someone else to free him”
Comment