Kind of interested in how this is going? Not sure if I understand what they are trying to do in Edmonton?
I assume it basically is going to lay out some kind of formula for where and how developement can take place?
So is it like if you get zoned "primary agriculture" or "Ag B"...you can kiss developement goodbye as "long as the grass grows and the wind blows"...or what?
I ask this because I wonder if it is going to be similar to Red Deer counties "land use policy" where if you were zoned Ag B you were condemned to being a peasant for the rest of your days!....Or at least that what it started out like...until the county violated its own rules...and then it was "Look out Matilda" and is pretty well wide open again!
I also wonder how respectful of the rules the government will be when the oil company comes calling? Will it be "We don't want no stinking hog barns" but "We need industry" and sure you boys can build that sour gas plant?
Who will decide? Will the "land board" have precidence over the EUB or the Surface Rights Board?....Why do I get the distinct feeling the Land Use thing will be used to mainly screw the old farmer while letting the slickers operate pretty well however they want?
I assume it basically is going to lay out some kind of formula for where and how developement can take place?
So is it like if you get zoned "primary agriculture" or "Ag B"...you can kiss developement goodbye as "long as the grass grows and the wind blows"...or what?
I ask this because I wonder if it is going to be similar to Red Deer counties "land use policy" where if you were zoned Ag B you were condemned to being a peasant for the rest of your days!....Or at least that what it started out like...until the county violated its own rules...and then it was "Look out Matilda" and is pretty well wide open again!
I also wonder how respectful of the rules the government will be when the oil company comes calling? Will it be "We don't want no stinking hog barns" but "We need industry" and sure you boys can build that sour gas plant?
Who will decide? Will the "land board" have precidence over the EUB or the Surface Rights Board?....Why do I get the distinct feeling the Land Use thing will be used to mainly screw the old farmer while letting the slickers operate pretty well however they want?
Comment