Originally posted by chuckChuck
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Canada falls short in several areas of health care...OECD countries, report says
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
And the right wants more for profit healthcare options and don't really care about the impact on care for everyone as long as they can afford to pay.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chuckChuck View PostAnd the right wants more for profit healthcare options and don't really care about the impact on care for everyone as long as they can afford to pay.
As mentioned before, most of the developed world has various forms of hybrid systems of healthcare delivery. Our rigid single payer system doesn't cut the mustard and we have to explore a better way.
No one I know is saying throw out our system for a totally private one. But there has to be a better way than what we have now.
Use your brain power for something better than being obtuse and prickly.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
In order to improve the health care system in this country we need to explore all avenues and take a more pragmatic approach leaving ideology at the door. Something difficult for rigid minded folks. The welfare state as it exists will not last if the status quo remains.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Guest
First thing I’d do is get rid of half these high priced administrators creating jobs for themselves in health and education
It’s a joke , half of them aren’t even experienced in their respective fields
salaries are online ,god damn pencil pusher making more than a doctor , absolute stupidityLast edited by Guest; Dec 18, 2023, 12:24.
- Likes 4
Comment
-
Originally posted by caseih View PostFirst thing I’d do is get rid of half these high priced administrators creating jobs for themselves in health and education
It’s a joke , half of them aren’t even experienced in their respective fields
salaries are online ,god damn pencil pusher making more than a doctor , absolute stupidity
Comment
-
-
-
-
Guest
-
The reason why we are spending less than the OECD on primary care is that the provinces are underfunding primary care to balance the books. They don't want to put enough money into training enough healthcare workers and doctors and paying them in a fair way. Family doctors are not getting enough fees for each visit that would attract them to family medicine.
They also don't put a priority on family medicine by making sure there are enough family doctors. So may of the ERs are full of people who could have been seen by a family doctor but they don't have one.
In resource rich provinces we can easily pay for much better primary healthcare that would reduce wait times. But no, the cheapskates who are responsible wont raise the revenue and as a consequence you can thank Curly Moe and Danny Smith for all the rural hospital closures.
And many of you keep voting for this?
Comment
-
-
The reason why we are spending less than the OECD on primary care is that the provinces are underfunding primary care to balance the books. They don't want to put enough money into training enough healthcare workers and doctors and paying them in a fair way. Family doctors are not getting enough fees for each visit that would attract them to family medicine.
They also don't put a priority on family medicine by making sure there are enough family doctors. So may of the ERs are full of people who could have been seen by a family doctor but they don't have one.
In resource rich provinces we can easily pay for much better primary healthcare that would reduce wait times. But no, the cheapskates who are responsible wont raise the revenue and as a consequence you can thank Curly Moe and Danny Smith for all the rural hospital closures.
And many of you keep voting for this? ?
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment