Tucker was kissing Putin's ass!
Tucker Carlson’s Putin interview wasn’t journalism. It was sycophancy
Margaret Sullivan
The Russian president was waiting for the right stooge. With Carlson, he got just that
Fri 9 Feb 2024 17.30 GMTLast modified on Fri 9 Feb 2024 18.00 GMT
The former Fox News host Tucker Carlson’s much touted sit-down with Vladimir Putin ([url]https://www.theguardian.com/world/vladimir-putin[/url]) was many things.
It was damaging to global democracy, giving ammunition to the craven congressional Republicans who want to do Putin’s bidding by denying aid to Ukraine. It was boring, particularly given the Russian president’s long discourse, early in the two-hour slog, on his version of the history of the region.
And it was a priceless propaganda gift, helping Putin in every possible way with his messaging – internally in Russia, and externally to the world – about Ukraine. That started with Carlson’s introductory video message, recorded after the interview, urging his viewers on X (formerly Twitter) to see Putin above all as “sincere”.
But here’s what the interview was not. It was not journalism, despite being a rare chance for a western media figure to question the Russian leader.
Even Carlson’s question – toward the end of the excruciatingly long session – about the imprisoned Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich wasn’t really a gesture of journalistic solidarity or a nod to democratic ideals about a free press.
Instead, it was decency theater, poorly performed.
Sucking up to Putin at every turn, Carlson described Gershkovich – an accomplished and respected American reporter in his 30s – as a “kid” and even suggesting that he may have done something illegal that justified his arrest almost a year ago.
Gershkovich’s colleagues at the Wall Street Journal were appropriately appalled. Ted Mann, a Journal reporter, tweeted that it was “disgraceful” of Carlson to suggest he’d broken the law, and the Journal issued a statement that made their position clear: “Evan is a journalist and journalism is not a crime. Any portrayal to the contrary is total fiction.”
Tucker Carlson’s Putin interview wasn’t journalism. It was sycophancy
Margaret Sullivan
The Russian president was waiting for the right stooge. With Carlson, he got just that
Fri 9 Feb 2024 17.30 GMTLast modified on Fri 9 Feb 2024 18.00 GMT
The former Fox News host Tucker Carlson’s much touted sit-down with Vladimir Putin ([url]https://www.theguardian.com/world/vladimir-putin[/url]) was many things.
It was damaging to global democracy, giving ammunition to the craven congressional Republicans who want to do Putin’s bidding by denying aid to Ukraine. It was boring, particularly given the Russian president’s long discourse, early in the two-hour slog, on his version of the history of the region.
And it was a priceless propaganda gift, helping Putin in every possible way with his messaging – internally in Russia, and externally to the world – about Ukraine. That started with Carlson’s introductory video message, recorded after the interview, urging his viewers on X (formerly Twitter) to see Putin above all as “sincere”.
But here’s what the interview was not. It was not journalism, despite being a rare chance for a western media figure to question the Russian leader.
Even Carlson’s question – toward the end of the excruciatingly long session – about the imprisoned Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich wasn’t really a gesture of journalistic solidarity or a nod to democratic ideals about a free press.
Instead, it was decency theater, poorly performed.
Sucking up to Putin at every turn, Carlson described Gershkovich – an accomplished and respected American reporter in his 30s – as a “kid” and even suggesting that he may have done something illegal that justified his arrest almost a year ago.
Gershkovich’s colleagues at the Wall Street Journal were appropriately appalled. Ted Mann, a Journal reporter, tweeted that it was “disgraceful” of Carlson to suggest he’d broken the law, and the Journal issued a statement that made their position clear: “Evan is a journalist and journalism is not a crime. Any portrayal to the contrary is total fiction.”
Comment