So what percentage of vehicles in canada need to be electric ? and what percentage of power generation needs to be renewable to fix climate change ? show us the science , dont tell us that research has not been done , or is it like the 2 weeks to flatten the curve that turned into 3 years to destroy the economy ?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Renewables pose little threat to agriculture, environment: report
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
“[B]From 2019 to 2021, the largest driver of agricultural land loss was expansion of pipelines and...
?
You might want to check your sources. Or at least pretend to understand the industry you pretend to be in, and the industry you constantly malign.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
I assume that Chuck and the author of this study must have seen pictures of pipelines on permafrost in Alaska or Siberia where they run them above ground, and assumed that that is how it's done everywhere.
Why would anyone embarrass themselves by coming on a public forum and revealing their gross ignorance.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
That was one item of several listed as a cause of land loss. Are you going to ignore all the oil wells and header sites and roads to oil and gas wells too?
Why did Danny and the dumpster fire ask the AUC to study the issue of land loss if they weren't credible or qualified?
So pipelines are never on the surface in Alberta? You are a liar or badly informed and probably both.
Comment
-
Congratulations chuck, you have your first official gotcha moment. You found a picture of above ground pipeline from fort mcmurray.
I concede defeat on this issue.
How much number one farmland do they have in fort mcmurray?
Comment
-
“Assuming all renewable development locates on (some of Alberta’s best) land, the percentage of (such) agricultural land loss is estimated to be less than one per cent by 2041,” says the Alberta Utilities Commission report, released Wednesday.?
And we all know most of the renewable energy installation is occurring on lower quality land in southern Alberta.
Gotcha again!
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
So the refinery is not sitting on good farmland?
What part of the following don't you understand?
“From 2019 to 2021, the largest driver of agricultural land loss was expansion of pipelines and industrial sites,” it says. “Other key drivers . . . include urban residential development, mines and wells, and roads.”?
Comment
-
Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View PostCongratulations chuck, you have your first official gotcha moment. You found a picture of above ground pipeline from fort mcmurray.
I concede defeat on this issue.
How much number one farmland do they have in fort mcmurray?
For such a smart Mensa member, he sure doesn't pick up on sarcasm very well.Last edited by AlbertaFarmer5; Mar 28, 2024, 10:45.
Comment
-
Meanwhile the Alberta tar sand rentention ponds and coal mines are leaking contaminants into the water systems of Alberta and thousands of suspended, abandoned and orphaned oil and gas wells are a risk to the ground water in Alberta with saltwater and hydrocarbon contamination. But the chronic complainers turn their eyes away and talk about solar panels in texas? Go figure!
Apparently the only time some Albertan's are concerned about the environment is when it involves renewable energy! Good grief Charlie Brown.
Oil and gas facilities use more good farmland and are a high risk to the environment. Renewables a much lower risk.
So says the Alberta Utilities Commission report commissioned by Danny Smith and the UCP. But of course some farmers on this site don't read anything and don't listen to the news.
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment